Better bargaining rights haven't cut public worker strikes, report says
Most members of public employee unions are keeping off the picket line and on the job this summer. The only major public-sector strike in the US today is by police and firemen in Mobile, Ala.
But this summer vacation from damaging strikes by state and city employees may be short-lived, forecasts a July report of the Public Service Research Council an independent organization devoted to research about public-sector unionism.
The proliferation of state and local bargaining legislation, the 75-page report concludes, is a major reason why almost a "four-fold increase" in strike activity occurred from 1958 to 1977. In 1965, for instance, when only nine states had some form of bargaining legislation covering state and local public employees, there were 47 strikes; but in 1978, when 37 states had adopted bargaining statutes, there were 481 strikes, according to preliminary figures.
"The proponents of compulsory public-sector bargaining have misled legislators to believe that the imposition of bargaining in the public sector would reduce union strike activity," says David Denholm, president of the Public Service Research Council. "But this study shows that this is not the case, but that, in fact, compulsory public-sector bargaining increases strikes."
The council's report concludes that "In most cases, strike activity was notably higher in the period following legislation. As a national compilation, states without or prior to bargaining legislation averaged 1.24 strikes per year , while states after legislation averaged 4.65 strikes per year -- almost a four-fold increase."
One reason put forward as to why more strikes occur after unions win more bargaining rights is that the laws enable unions to wield more power than they did previously and they become more demanding. The results of a public employee strike, of course, can be devastating in many instances -- sometimes creating a state of emergency.