Menu
Share
Share this story
Close X
 
Switch to Desktop Site

Did TV change Election '80?

About these ads

When the major television networks -hours before the polls closed last November--declared Ronald Reagan the winner over Jimmy Carter, millions of Americans who had intended to vote stayed home.

A new study by Universtiy of Michigan researchers confirms that about one-quarter of those who planned to vote in the 1980 presidential election later in the day decided not to if they heard the networks' projections of Carter's subsequent concession.

Until now there has been much speculation and criticism of the netwoeks, but this report is the first hard evidence that election-day television coverage may have grown from merely reporting to influencing the outcome.

State election officials and political partisans -especially Democrats -have cried "foul" at the media projections, and the new study gives support to their complaints. It concludes that "it was Carter and the Democrats who were disadvantaged." Democratic candidates lost several key races on the West Coast (where the networks named Reagan the winner nearly three hours before the polls closed) by a handful of votes. Of those congressional seats which changed hands in the West, Republicans picked up four while Democrats gained only one.

"The part that bothers me is how much attention is placed on the presidential race," said John Jackson of the University of Michigan's Center for Political Studies. "I think it is unfortunate with all the nonpresidential races going on."

Network officials now are reexamining their election coverage in light of this new information, which was commissioned in part by ABC News.

"It's a study that's been done with great care," said Les Crystal, senior executive producer for NBC News. "Obviously, I've got to look at it closely. We all have to."

The concern is not simply partisan. Groups such as the League of Women Voters have warned that the race to project election victories may have "serious and harmful effects on voter confidence in the integrity of the election system and in the value of an individual vote," as league president Ruth Hinerfeld testified earlier this year.

"People's likelihood of voting is related to their perception of the value of their vote in determining the election's outcome," the new study says. "Events that alter that perceived value alter turnout."

Next

Page:   1   |   2


Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

Loading...