Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Is reporter's word a contract?

About these ads

WHEN a reporter says: ``I won't use your name,'' is he making an oral legal contract or just a good-faith pledge of confidentiality? Most editors insist that it has to be the latter, because there are rare circumstances under which the promise of anonymity may have to be broken. These might include situations where it is felt the reader has a right to know the source of the information to evaluate its possible bias.

Basically, however, a reporter has no authority to make legal contracts - oral or written.

That has been the modus operandi - at least until recently, when a Minnesota trial court held that two newspapers, the Minneapolis Star Tribune and the St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch, had broken oral agreements with a public relations man by naming him as the source of information in an article after promising anonymity.

Actually, it was the reporters who were researching the story who had agreed to confidentiality, but they were overruled by their editors.

A jury awarded the plaintiff, Dan Cohen, $200,000 in actual damages and $500,000 in punitive damages.

Mr. Cohen lost his job as a result of the press disclosures, and that may justify the actual damages.

It is the punitive damages, however, that worry most news specialists, regardless of how they feel about this particular case.

Stephen Gard, professor of law at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, points out that the amount of the award is ``far greater than a person would recover for the loss of a limb.''

Jane Kirtley, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, says that by this finding, ``The court has turned an ethical concern into something that is a legal contract.''

And Everette Dennis, who heads the Columbia University-based Gannett Center for Media Studies, claims that the jury should have been instructed on First Amendment press freedoms. ``Reporters don't have the authority to make a verbal contract,'' Mr. Dennis insists.

An appellate court may very well reverse this ruling, particularly the punitive damages.

There are lessons to be learned here, however, both by the news media and others. Among them:

Reporters should not be too quick to promise anonymity, particularly if they can't guarantee it. Whenever possible, they should prod a source to go on the record. Stories that directly attribute information usually have more credibility with the reader.


Page:   1   |   2

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.