Souter Praised For Intellect, but Short on Specifics
As the Senate Judiciary Committee questions the New Hampshire judge, liberals find little to criticize
AS self-effacing David Souter slips behind a red felt-covered witness table again today, the vacant Supreme Court seat two blocks away is almost within reach. Barring some totally unexpected revelation, Senate confirmation now appears virtually assured for President Bush's nominee to fill the Court seat of the retired Justice William Brennan.
``Thus far, he's a winner,'' says David O'Brien, professor of government at the University of Virginia.
What Americans apparently will get as the newest Supreme Court justice is ``a solid judicial conservative,'' but not a right-wing ideologue, Professor O'Brien says. ``The constant refrain that came out of the [first two days of] hearings was his admiration for'' past conservative judges John Harlan and Felix Frankfurter.
``He clearly tried to portray himself as a centrist on a conservative Court,'' O'Brien adds, ``not mentioning how conservative the Court is becoming.
Although several Senate Judiciary Committee liberals are frustrated that they have been unable to draw more specific views on the contentious abortion issue from Judge Souter - who since early this year has been a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit - most of the hard questioning seems over.
Indeed, after a few exchanges, senators of both parties in the high ceilinged, paneled hearing room, were quick to praise the nominee for his intellect, legal knowledge, and skillful, low-key presentation.
In turn and by subject an arc of 14 seated senators interrogated the nominee politely but firmly the first two days. Delaware's Joseph Biden, his questions sometimes as long as the answers, pressed on abortion. Pennsylvania's no-nonsense Arlen Specter took up separation of church and state. Massachusetts' Ted Kennedy bore in on civil rights. Illinois' Paul Simon sought a champion for the disadvantaged.