Ralph Nader is not a sell-out
William Klein's Dec. 22 opinion piece, "Ralph Nader for sale," reminds me of those who criticized Mr. Nader when he disclosed assets totalling some $3 million - as though Nader's political platform is somehow contradictory to personal wealth. Besides, these critics willfully ignore the fact that Nader lives on $25,000 a year, devoting the rest of his income to public-interest campaigns.
Mr. Klein thinks that it's wrong for Nader to raise funds by selling campaign memorabilia. Nader's campaign was an indictment of corporate-funded elections - not those financed by small contributions from private citizens. Klein's conflation of these two fundraising methods is ridiculous, and he must know it. His disingenuous attack is unfortunately all too familiar.
Oliver Hall San Francisco
Hillary Clinton is bestseller material
Your Dec. 22 editorial"Hillary's publishing deal" puts Senator-elect Hillary Clinton's book dealin the same questionable categoryasdeals by Jim Wright and Newt Gingrich.
But there is a crucial difference.The soon-to-be junior senator from New Yorkis one of the most famous women in the world. Her "It Takes a Village" was a bestseller.
Whether or not she wasan elected official, book publishers would have scrambledto sign her up. This could not be said about the two House Speakers whose activities came under a cloud.
Tarja Black Lancaster, Calif.
US should push Israel to peace only
I must vehemently disagree with Daniel Pipes's Dec. 26 opinion piece, "US must firm up Israel's will."
The four policies that are urged upon the US make me wonder what world Mr. Pipes lives in.
His first policy is "No more Israeli territorial concessions." Doesn't Pipes know that there are 300,000 Israelis illegally occupying Palestine? His second policy is to "Encourage Israel to appear fearsome." Doesn't he see the photographs of heavily armed Israeli soldiers shooting at rock-throwing children?