The latest effort at Middle East peacemaking is getting off to a slow start.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon this week made a play for the high road, effectively ordering his troops not to shoot first, but Palestinians have not reciprocated, and the violence has continued anyway.
US diplomats charged with trying to broker a stand-down have met with Mr. Sharon, but Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat has been too busy visiting France, Egypt, and Jordan to meet the Americans. "Sharon has made his gesture," says a US official who declines to be quoted by name. "Now we're trying to see Mr. Arafat in an effort to advance frameworks and schedules for negotiations."
The impasse is plain to see. The Israelis refuse to offer any concessions to the Palestinians or even to commit to substantive negotiations until the violence stops. The Palestinians say they are in no position to call off their uprising, or intifada, until it is clear that they will get some tangible benefit from the Israelis. Their logic is that there has been too much blood spilled on the Palestinian side to allow an unconditional return to peace talks.
But the new peace effort - inspired by the recommendations of a committee led by former US Sen. George Mitchell - is causing some people to think about the direction of events.
The driving force behind the intifada is a militia known as the Tanzim, Arabic for "organization," which is part of the dominant Palestinian political faction, Fatah. On Wednesday evening a Tanzim member in the West Bank town of Beit Jala, the scene of numerous gun battles with Israeli forces, described how Tanzim fighters had used a heavy machine gun to shoot at Israelis.
Apparently breathless from the confrontation, he would not give his name. But he said the peace moves had shaken things up among the Tanzim members he knows. "Some want to stop, and some want to continue," he said. "We're all disagreeing with each other."