A bus ride tests limits of police searches
High court hears case today on whether authorities can frisk passengers for drugs.
A Greyhound bus traveling from Fort Lauderdale to Detroit makes a scheduled stop in Tallahassee, Fla. When passengers reboard, they are not alone.
Two police officers dressed in civilian clothes move through the bus, asking riders about their travel plans and luggage. They say they're looking for drugs and illegal weapons. A third officer remains at the front, watching.
Near the back of the bus, the officers encounter two men wearing heavy jackets on a warm day. The police ask for permission to search their luggage and then ask to pat them down for weapons.
One says, "Sure." The other raises his hands a few inches to facilitate a frisk. That's when the officers discover packages taped to their thighs with more than a pound and a half of cocaine.
Does this operation amount to an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment, or is it an acceptable tactic for police in the war on drugs?
That's the question the US Supreme Court will consider this morning, when the justices take up a case exploring how far police may go in inducing bus riders to consent to searches.
The case is also important because it arises amid an expanding war on terrorism, with the nation debating how best to balance the need for security against traditional civil-liberties protections.
"The worst thing the terrorists could do to us would be that ... their actions would deprive us of our fundamental freedoms," says Jeffrey Green, a Washington, D.C., lawyer and member of the defense team representing the bus riders. "One among [those freedoms] is the right to say no to a police officer who approaches us without a warrant and without reasonable suspicion."
At the center of the case is the question of to what extent police must make it clear to a bus passenger that he has a constitutional right to refuse a police request to search his luggage or to search him.
The Fourth Amendment requires that police first obtain a warrant or have reasonable suspicion that a crime is under way before they invade a person's privacy by searching him or his luggage. But neither a warrant nor reasonable suspicion is required when a person voluntarily permits a search.
The critical question in the case of Christopher Drayton and Clifton Brown Jr., the two men found smuggling cocaine on the bus, is whether their grant of permission to police was truly voluntary or whether they were intimidated by a show of force.