A British academics' union has called for a boycott of two Israeli universities, prompting a major outcry.
Hebrew University sociologist Baruch Kimmerling coined the term "politicide" to describe Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's approach toward the Palestinians.
In a 2002 article that was expanded into a book, Mr. Kimmerling wrote that Mr. Sharon was undertaking "a gradual but systematic attempt to cause their annihilation as an independent political and social entity." Since then, his criticisms of what he terms Israel's "colonial project" in the West Bank have been no less devastating.
But Kimmerling and other Israeli academics who unabashedly oppose the occupation now find themselves, along with colleagues of different political hues, on the defensive against an unprecedented boycott approved last month by the governing body of Britain's 40,000-strong Association of University teachers (AUT).
The boycott specifically targets Haifa and Bar Ilan universities, but it is being taken as a sanction against Israeli academia as a whole - and being opposed virtually across the political spectrum here.
One of its lone Israeli supporters, Haifa University political scientist Ilan Pappe, who cooperated with AUT members in advancing it, sees the boycott as a key step toward pressuring Israel to end its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, much as international sanctions were used against apartheid South Africa.
Independent analysts differ over whether the British move is likely to reverberate into further boycotts emanating from Europe.
Even withing the AUT, there are misgivings, with opponents hoping to overturn the boycott decision during a special meeting of the organization's national council, scheduled for May 26. AUT has yet to spell out precisely what the boycott entails.
"It is very significant," Mr. Pappe says. "Boycotting should bring the same results as in South Africa: a fundamental change in basic policies."