Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

No one blinks, yet, on US attorney firings

About these ads

As they trade threats and bluster over whether top White House aides will publicly testify about the firings of federal prosecutors, Congress and the Bush administration seem headed for a constitutional confrontation.

But if history is any guide, it is a showdown that will be settled by political negotiation. Most disputes over executive privilege – the legal doctrine that discussions between a president and his advisers can be kept secret – don't end up as lawsuits, say experts.

"These matters are not traditionally litigated," says Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. "Courts don't like them and it takes too much time."

There are important exceptions to this rule. Near the beginning of President Bush's first term, the administration refused to release to Congress papers from an energy task force headed by Vice President Dick Cheney. That position was ultimately supported by the US Supreme Court.

However, recent presidents – including Bill Clinton and Mr. Bush – in general have used a threat of resorting to a claim of executive privilege as their opening bid in a poker game with Congress over the release of internal information.

Some feel this trivializes an important aspect of the American system of the separation of powers of the branches of government. The invocation of executive privilege should be a last resort, says Mark Rozell, a professor of public policy at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.

If Bush truly believes that political adviser Karl Rove and other current and former top aides should not give sworn testimony about the firings of US prosecutors, he should not allow them to speak to Congress at all, says Professor Rozell. Yet the administration has already offered to allow aides to speak with lawmakers in private.

"If he's willing to let them talk, why not under oath?" says Rozell. "It seems to me this is also an opening of negotiations by the president."

Still, on Wednesday the confrontation between Congress and the White House became at least one notch more intense. A House Judiciary subcommittee on a voice vote approved the issuance of legal orders for Mr. Rove, former White House counsel Harriet Miers, and others to testify under oath about the dismissals of eight US attorneys.


Page:   1   |   2

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.