Clinton's mixed answer on driver's licenses for illegal aliens helps focus the 2008 election on solutions.
Hurrah for elections. They often clarify the preferred action on an issue. Take the question of what to do with millions of illegal aliens in the US. Last spring, Congress was gridlocked over it. Now the question is on the campaign stump for the 2008 election. Just ask Hillary Clinton.
During last week's debate among Democratic presidential candidates, she tried to walk on both sides of a question over whether people who violate immigration law should be given a driver's license. That idea, proposed by New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, is the latest move that would, in effect, partially legalize illegal residents – a prospect that has been at the heart of a debate in Congress.
Her Democratic opponents went after Senator Clinton's ambiguous answer, but the larger point was that illegal immigration has become a wedge issue within and between the two major parties, both nationally and in many local races. That's a healthy debate which can only help voters choose the best candidates for Congress and the White House who will act firmly on illegal immigration.
Democrats, especially, have learned that immigration is a hot-button issue after they nearly lost an Oct. 5 special congressional race in Massachusetts. Their own polling of independent voters shows that illegal immigration outweighs concerns over healthcare and Iraq.
Last spring, US lawmakers balked at measures to grant a path to citizenship for illegals. Last month, the Senate also rejected the proposed "Dream Act," which would have provided aid for a college education to children who entered the US illegally with their parents. Such failed attempts highlight the question of whether to give any government benefits and privileges to illegal aliens.