Skip to footer

5 great interviews with female crime authors

A few decades ago, female mystery writers tended to be named Agatha Christie – or at least to write like the woman who took that as her pen name. Their detective tales might feature depraved characters – Christie's novels were often bolder than we remember – but they didn't boast the action, mayhem, and scandalous sexuality of private-eye novels. That was the domain of men with names like Chandler and Hammett.

But then the 1980s came, introducing us to authors like Sara Paretsky and Sue Grafton. They, and their characters, didn't play by the old rules. Now, you can go into any bookstore and pick up remarkable new mystery novels featuring characters like a pregnant detective in Glasgow, an unstable private eye in post-Katrina New Orleans, and a park ranger who can't step foot in a national park without coming across a dead body.

Over the past year or so, I've interviewed 5 of my favorite female mystery authors about their books and their characters. Here are some excerpts. (Click on the links to read the full interviews.)

1. Denise Mina on the evolution of the fictional female detective

  • By Randy Dotinga

"At first, they had to act like men, carry guns and punch people – be able to beat people up and engage in fisticuffs. In the mid-1990s, their gender is talked about a lot, and they experienced prejudice.

"Now you've reached the point where a woman is just a different type of detective. You're not getting information just because you're a woman; it's not your superpower anymore. It's just a fact about who you are."

– Read the full interview with Denise Mina, author of the "Alex Morrow" series

1 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.