3 of spring's most anticipated novels

In this fiction roundup, a woman named Ursula Todd dies and lives again, two men return to Maine after a family disaster, and a WWII veteran struggles to manage his love life.

1. 'Life After Life,' by Kate Atkinson

“Life After Life” By Kate Atkinson Reagan Arthur Books, Little, Brown 544 pages

It's the great what-if of 20th-century time travel, tackled by everyone from “Doctor Who” to “To Say Nothing of the Dog” author Connie Willis: What if you could go back in time and kill Hitler? (Although, why stop there? A quick field trip to Soviet Russia to remove Stalin from the equation would save millions of lives as well.)

In Life After Life, Whitbread Award-winning author Kate Atkinson – taking a break from her Jackson Brodie mysteries – has turned a high-concept conceit into an intricately crafted, totally engaging new novel. (Confusingly, Atkinson's is one of two novels with the same title out this spring. The other “Life After Life,” is set at hospice in North Carolina and is the first novel in 17 years by Jill McCorkle.)

During a snowstorm in 1910, a baby girl is born – and dies almost immediately. The next time, the doctor is available to save her – only to have her drown as a four-year-old on a seaside vacation. Fortunately, Ursula Todd has more lives than a Time Lord. Her apparent immortality is never explained, but as she gets older, she starts to rely on her sense of déjà vu to avoid perils – with the flu epidemic of 1918 proving especially tricky to avoid.

“Life After Life” uses a format similar to the “Choose Your Own Adventure” stories popular in the 1980s. If Ursula is even a few minutes late meeting a neighbor's daughter one afternoon, for instance, the little girl dies. Other paths lead out from similar choices: Taking a back stairway in her home one afternoon leads to a particularly bleak outcome, while a modern languages course in college hints at future possibilities.

“What if you had the chance to do it again and again, until you finally got it right? Would you do it?” her beloved younger brother, Teddy, asks.

Readers get to know different sides of her parents, Hugh and Sylvie, her aunt, Isabel and her siblings, as they react to the different choices Ursula makes. Teddy and Pamela, her older sister, remain wonderful. There simply is no hope for her stodgy older brother, Maurice. 

The effort and sacrifice implicit in Teddy's question become apparent later in the novel, during episodes when Ursula volunteers as an air raid warden, loses members of her family or dies repeatedly in the Blitz. 

“You can step into the same river but the water will always be new,” Ursula translates Heraclitus for a friend, and Atkinson uses that truism to great effect in her heroine's life.

It's impossible not to make comparisons with “Groundhog Day,” the much-loved (in our house, anyway) 1993 comedy in which Bill Murray is trapped in Punxsutawney, Penn., until he manages to get one day exactly right. (“I've been shot, strangled, electrocuted.” “I wasn't just killed yesterday.”)

But Ursula has higher stakes than winning over Andie MacDowell, as a prologue makes clear. “Life After Life” operates more like a video game, with Ursula's life resetting – seemingly endlessly – to that snowstorm in February 1910.

The title is the most generic thing about “Life After Life.” Atkinson combines the cleverness of metafiction with the warmth and detail of period fiction for an end result that is satisfyingly original.

1 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.