4 new trends for YA novels

Vampires? Check. Zombies? Been there. Werewolves? Done that. For the last decade, young adult literature has enjoyed an extended moment in the sun thanks to the popularity of magic-, vampire-, and fantasy-filled hits like “Harry Potter,” “Twilight,” and “The Hunger Games.” But after a decade-long run, we’re suspecting readers may be tiring of the magic spells, death matches, and dystopian plotlines. “Dystopia is pretty much dead,” literary agent Barry Goldblatt said in an earlier Monitor post on the next chapter in YA Lit, “After dystopia, what next?”

So what is next in young adult lit? For publishers, that is – literally – the million dollar question. Fortunately for us, the folks at Bookish have proposed four possibilities for the next big thing in YA lit – an early look at what might just be the next hot thing to hit shelves and bestseller lists.

Jaap Buitendijk/Summit Entertainment/AP
'Divergent,' the film adaptation of Veronica Roth's bestselling dystopian young adult novel, stars Shailene Woodley (l.) and Theo James (r.).

1. A future devoid of love

John Vizcaino/Reuters

Bookish editor Kelly Gallucci foresees a trend of “loveless futures,” piggybacking off dystopian themes, in which love is the enemy in future societies which concoct inventive ways to suppress the emotion.

“Now an enemy, 'love' becomes a foreign concept, and these dark futures have a variety of solutions for eradicating the organic emotion: computer generated ideal mates, elaborate courting ceremonies, and (gulp) extraction,” Gallucci writes. “These books take 'first love' to the next level with teenagers discovering the forbidden emotional and fighting to keep it alive.”

This theme combines the recent theme of dystopian societies with the timeless theme of love, injecting both with fresh appeal.

1 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.