12 sports books make a summer reading potluck

Variety is the name of the game for the publishers of these recent sports releases, which range from the story of a family of baseball catchers to a tribute to the knuckleball to an introspective exploration by a woman rower and beyond. Together they offer a summer full of good reading.

1. ‘Ashe vs. Connors: Wimbledon 1975: Tennis That Went Beyond Centre Court,’ by Peter Bodo

Author Pete Bodo acknowledges that the 1975 Wimbledon final isn’t on the short list of great Wimbledon finals.  After all, Arthur Ashe was clearly the better player on this occasion, scoring his first victory ever over defending champion Jimmy Connors, 6-1, 6-1, 5-7, 6-4, in the first all-American Wimbledon since 1947.  Still, the match was a compelling study in contrasts between Ashe, the well-mannered African-American, and Connors, the brash, white maverick who ushered in the age of hard-charging celebrity stars. This account, which appears on the 40th anniversary of their memorable match, dissects not only the match itself, but the tennis developments that ultimately led to their center-court showdown.

Here’s an excerpt from Ashe vs. Connors:

“In the light of future events, Ashe’s win can be regarded as a final, thunderous salvo fired on behalf of the old guard and the values it represented. Ashe is the last American Grand Slam singles champion who earned his college degree. He was the last to serve in the Armed Forces. He subscribed to the code of the gentlemanly conduct, represented his country with pride and dignity, and took an active role in the affairs of his profession – to the benefit of his colleagues and peers. He also sought to become a true citizen of the world, taking full advantage of the opportunities the touring life afforded to experience other cultures.”

1 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.