Baseball 2016: touching base with seven new books

Here’s an around-the-horn look at a lineup of diverse releases:

2. ‘The Cardinals Way: How One Team Embraced Tradition and Moneyball at the Same Time,’ by Howard Megdal

St. Louis has a reputation as perhaps the best baseball city in America, with a huge following of knowledgeable and loyal fans. Of course, the Cardinals organization deserves credit for holding up its end of the bargain by producing contending teams probably more consistently than any other major-league organization. How they accomplish this is the focus of “The Cardinals Way,” which takes an in-depth look at the club’s methods of consistently identifying and developing promising young players. Part of its template for remaining a model franchise is in fusing the old with the new, marrying old-school scouting with new-age statistical analytics. In this hybridized way, the Cardinals continue to restock their roster with a seemingly bottomless pool of talent groomed in their own farm system.  

Here’s an excerpt from The Cardinals Way:

“Nearly fifty area players gathered on the main field at Roger Dean Stadium [in Jupiter, Fla.] early Tuesday morning. This was the final chance for the Cardinals to ask questions and to observe, and for each player, it was the final chance to make an impression on the group of scouts and [former director of scouting Dan] Kantrovitz, all of whom had been tracking the prospects for a year, often longer.

“Charlie Gonzalez was utterly in his element. Gonzalez’s red complexion, honed through years in Florida sunshine on surfboards and in stands at baseball games, actually paled in comparison to his bright red, button-down shirt, Gonzalez protected from that sun by a tan panama hat. 

“He seemed to be moving in every direction at once, lining up the would-be shortstops to make the throws from various distances at the position, along with the few second basemen.”

2 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.