3 captivating biographies for women's history month

From children's lit to poetry to cinema – these three women made big contributions.

2. 'Elizabeth Bishop: A Miracle for Breakfast,' by Megan Marshall

Elizabeth Bishop: A Miracle for Breakfast By Megan Marshall Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 384 pp.

Megan Marshall's brilliant new book Elizabeth Bishop: A Miracle for Breakfast, presents in alternate chapters Marshall's tremendously empathetic biography of her former teacher and her own memoir of her years intersecting with Bishop in Boston and Cambridge.

This combined approach creates a stunningly effective portrait of the famously elusive Bishop, who achieved immortality in American letters on the strength of a mere 100 poems but was not only shy but intensely private, particularly about her passionate love affairs with other women. Marshall's account follows Bishop from Boston's Lewis Wharf to Key West to Brazil, and readers are given rich, thoughtful looks at her relationships with editors, family, students, fellow writers (the glimpses of Mary McCarthy are particularly good) and of course other poets, including the eccentric Marianne Moore and the baleful, magnetic figure of Robert Lowell, with whom Bishop had a complicated friendship that Marshall renders beautifully.

Throughout the years of these relationships, Bishop wrote with the mostly steady chipping of reserved genius (the subject of Eleanor Cook's impressive 2016 book "Elizabeth Bishop at Work"), a process Marshall saw first-hand and understands as well as anybody who's yet written about Bishop.

“Her poetic gift had come to her early in a time of need,” Marshall writes, “and she had nurtured it, as it had nurtured her, not in the classroom but in solitude.” Bishop's friend Elizabeth Hardwick once wrote of her, “Strange things happened in her presence, emanations, a sudden effloresence that might have come from the rubbing of a lamp.” "Elizabeth Bishop: A Miracle for Breakfast" comes closer than any other book to conveying that sudden effloresence to readers who know only the famous poems and not the woman behind them.

2 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.