Henrietta Lacks family, National Institutes of Health come to privacy agreement

The Lacks family, who became famous through Rebecca Skloot's book 'The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks,' will now have more say over research done using Henrietta's cells.

|
Lacks Family via the Henrietta Lacks Foundation/AP
Henrietta Lacks had cells taken from her body before her death in 1951, and the cells have been used in thousands of studies all over the world.

An important new development to add to the story of Henrietta Lacks, a narrative that was discovered by thousands of readers when Rebecca Skloot’s 2010 book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” became a bestseller.

Lacks, who was diagnosed with cervical cancer and died in 1951, had tumor cells taken from her by doctors who then discovered that her cells could survive in a lab setting, something no cells had been able to do before. Since then, Lacks’ cells have been used in as many as 74,000 cancer studies despite the fact that neither Lacks nor her family ever gave permission for her cells to be used for scientific research.

However, the Lacks family will now be more involved with the HeLa cells, as they’re known, and how they’re used for scientific purposes, as the result of a recent agreement between the Lacks family and the National Institutes of Health.

A couple of recent developments made the need for an agreement more urgent. This past March, European Molecular Biology Laboratory scientists sequenced Lacks’ genome and published it, which meant anyone could download it. In addition, Nature magazine was about to release a new NIH-sponsored study from the University of Washington that had been done on Lacks’ cells, examining the way that they have survived as no other cells have ever been know to do. The Lacks family objected when they found out about the two projects.

“I said, ‘No, this is not right,’ ” Lacks’ granddaughter, Jeri Lacks Whye, told The New York Times. “They should not have this up unless they have consent from the family.”

The highly public nature of the information was the concern that the Lacks family wanted to address, Lacks Whye told the NYT.

“The biggest concern was privacy,” she said. “What information was actually going to be out there about our grandmother, and what information they can obtain from her sequencing that will tell them about her children and grandchildren and going down the line.”

Nature held off on publishing the article and the EMBL took the genome data down while the Lacks family and the NIH discussed how to proceed, and soon the group settled on a policy with which to go forward. The information from the EMBL and the data from the University of Washington study would both be put in the NIH genotypes and phenotypes database. However, those wanting the information for research would have to apply to a HeLa Genome Data Access group and, once approved, submit reports on their work. The group would include two members of the Lacks family. (Meanwhile, the Nature article was published earlier this month.) The Lacks family will not receive money from products created through the research under the current agreement.

“In 20 years at N.I.H., I can’t remember something like this,” NIH director Francis Collins told the NYT.

In an interview with USA Today, he said this should only be the beginning of new agreements between families and medical science.

“Frankly the science has moved faster than the consent process, and maybe it is time to catch up,” he said.

Skloot, who said she listened to the meetings between the NIH and the Lacks family through speaker phone, told National Geographic that the agreement was a huge step forward for the family.

“In my wildest dreams, what I hoped would happen [is that the book would] lead to a big national discussion that would result in scientists and the Lacks family being in the room together talking and making some kinds of decisions about policy,” she said. “It's an incredible thing to see.”

An HBO movie of “Henrietta Lacks” is currently being planned and Oprah Winfrey and “True Blood” creator and executive producer Alan Ball are set to produce.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Henrietta Lacks family, National Institutes of Health come to privacy agreement
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2013/0819/Henrietta-Lacks-family-National-Institutes-of-Health-come-to-privacy-agreement
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe