Gov. Jerry Brown calls for mention of 'significance' of Obama's election in California textbooks

Brown recently signed a law recommending that the state's Instructional Quality Commission 'consider including, and recommending for adoption by the state board, instruction on the election of President Barack Obama and the significance of the United States electing its first African-American president, as appropriate.'

|
Marco Ugarte/AP
California Governor Jerry Brown speaks during a press conference with U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Anthony Wayne at the Soumaya museum in Mexico City.

We can already hear conservatives cracking jokes about crazy California liberals thanks to this news out of Sacramento: Gov. Jerry Brown just signed a new law recommending textbooks include sections that teach the significance of President Obama’s presidential election.

Measure AB 1912 specifically calls for the state’s Instructional Quality Commission to “consider including, and recommending for adoption by the state board, instruction on the election of President Barack Obama and the significance of the United States electing its first African-American president, as appropriate,” according to reports

Democratic Assemblyman Chris Holden authored the bill.

“We want to make sure that future generations understand that the election of our nation’s first African-American president was a historic step in the effort towards equality and that previous elections involved intimidation and violence that prevented millions of African-Americans from voting,” Mr. Holden said in a statement.

Holden also said the law is “the first step toward acknowledging President Obama’s legacy for generations to come” and allows Obama to “take his rightful place in California textbooks.”

Not surprisingly, the bill has its detractors.

What is surprising is just who is against the bill. It’s not just conservatives.

The editorial board of the LA Times published an editorial earlier this summer criticizing the decision.

“For all the criticism that's (justifiably) leveled at Texas over its right-wing rewrite of its history textbooks, California is surely the nation's capital of legislative interference with what should be the job of academics,” the editorial read.

It later continued, “High-level political interference in the making of curriculum and textbooks is inappropriate, and it has a long and troubled history. This is no less of an interference, though certainly more academically defensible, than if Republican legislators in Texas passed a bill saying that the Obama election should be left out of textbooks there.”

A southern California public radio station hosted a discussion over whether politicians should have influence over textbook content, saying, “Critics say the idea that politicians, who might have agendas, should have influence over what children read and learn in school is bad for education because it could be too biased.”

They were inundated with comments both for and against the measure.

We can’t say we’re surprised – and we’re sure this is just the beginning of the debate over the new California law. 

From a Virginia textbook that claimed that thousands of black soldiers fought for the Confederacy to one that appears to conflate Islam and terrorism, to another that stoked debate between evolutionists and creationists, textbooks and school curricula have long been a source of contention, and we suspect this latest controversy will be no exception.

Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Gov. Jerry Brown calls for mention of 'significance' of Obama's election in California textbooks
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2014/0827/Gov.-Jerry-Brown-calls-for-mention-of-significance-of-Obama-s-election-in-California-textbooks
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe