Best in Show: Costly Westminster win for Malachy the Pekingese

Best in Show at Westminster will garner Malachy the Pekingese prestige and fame, but not much else. What did his Best in Show run cost?

|
Seth Wenig/AP
Malachy, a Pekingese, sits in the trophy after being named best in show at the 136th annual Westminster Kennel Club dog show in New York, Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2012. To get the Pekingese his spot in the trophy, Malachy's owners likely shelled out hundreds of thousands of dollars.

When Malachy the Pekingese waddled his way to "Best in Show" at the 2012 Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show Tuesday night, he earned a slew of prizes. Among them: instant fame, appearances on the Today Show, The View, Fox and Friends, and others; the coveted silver bowl (in which, according to photos, he’s already taken a nap), a ribbon bigger than he is, and thousands of dollars in stud fees for his proud owners, including handler David Fitzpatrick. He’ll eat a steak dinner at Sardi’s, tour the Empire State Building, and ring the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday morning.

What he won’t get, however, is a nickel of prize money. And whatever Malachy (full name: Palacegarden Malachy) will earn in breeding fees and sponsorships as a result of his Westminster victory, it will pale in comparison to the money it took to get the little dog to the big show.

The TV share for the Westminster show has grown considerably over the past few years. Last year, the broadcast, shown over two days on the CNBC and USA networks, netted 3.5 million viewers – a 56 percent increase over 2010 and the show’s biggest audience in five years, according to the Westminster Kennel Club website. The second day of the event, when the Best in Show winner is crowned, routinely fills Madison Square Garden to near-capacity.  The dogs and their handlers, though, are compensated with little more than adulation and the satisfaction of victory – like college football players.

To get an invitation to Westminster, 4-year-old Malachy had to compete in hundreds of shows across the country, racking up 115 Best in Show wins over his career. Along the way, he probably also racked up travel bills, handler fees, groomer services, entry, fees, and promotion that run into the six figures.

That's right, hundreds of thousands of dollars in costs with no hope of recouping it. And yes, part of the money goes toward promotion: The most elite dogs competing in AKC shows have their own ad campaigns, with owners and kennels buying ad space in AKC and purebred dog trade publications, including “Dog News” and “The Canine Chronicle.”

The ads list a dog’s pedigree and show history, as well as personality traits and a personal bio. A recent “Dog News” cover ad, for the Puli breed “Cordmaker Rumpus Bumpus,” (nicknamed “Ziggy,”) opens like a glowing magazine profile of a celebrity:

“There is an old sports adage that says no matter how hard it is to play the game, your goal should always be to finish strong. However, in Ziggy’s case finishing strong was just the beginning of something great.”

In a sport (or hobby, pageant, whatever you want to call it) as subjective as confirmation dog shows, a reputation can go a long way with judges, and owners are willing to pay dearly for it. In a 2010 New York Times article, Kathy Kirk, the handler of 2006 Westminster Best in Show champion, Rufus, estimated that the colored bull terrier’s three-year championship run cost $700,000 in all. Malachy has been doing this for a few years – he made it to the Best in Show ring at Westminster in 2011 as well, but lost to Hickory, a Scottish Deerhound.

Furthermore, there is very little money to be had in sponsorships for these dogs. 2008 Best in Show winner Uno the beagle was featured in a full page USA Today ad for Purina, for which his owners went uncompensated, according to the Times article.

As a result of the high price tag of these shows, most of the top dogs in the show circuit are basically incorporated, owned by several people or entities. Malachy, for instance, belongs to three people: Dr. Iris Love, a New York-based archaeologist; Sandra Middlebrooks of Mobile, Ala.; and Fitzpatrick, his handler. They aren’t in it for the money, which is a good thing – dog shows may be the only widely televised sport left where the competition is its own reward.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Best in Show: Costly Westminster win for Malachy the Pekingese
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2012/0215/Best-in-Show-Costly-Westminster-win-for-Malachy-the-Pekingese
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe