Embattled GM suspends two engineers, asks NASA for help

After a roasting in Congress last week, GM has suspended two engineers documents suggest are linked to the ignition switch problem and asked NASA to look into the safety of its recalled cars.

|
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) of Missouri questions General Motors CEO Mary Barra on Capitol Hill in Washington last week.

Amid an ongoing federal investigation into its recall of vehicles linked to 13 deaths, General Motors has placed two engineers on paid leave and is asking NASA to determine the safety of the cars it is recalling.

The moves come a week after members of Congress sharply criticized GM, saying the company has not been transparent enough in dealing with a defective ignition switch that investigators say momentarily powers down the engine and disables the airbags. About 2.6 million vehicles have been recalled worldwide.

GM did not identify the two engineers, but media reports identify them as Ray DeGiorgio, a switch engineer, and Gary Altman, a chief development engineer. Both men provided depositions last year in a civil suit related to the switches.

Mr. Altman said he first noticed the ignition switch problem in 2004 and described a replacement switch issued in 2006 as an “improvement” but “not a fix to the issue,” according to documents collected by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which is investigating the recall. Even so, Altman said he agreed with the installation of the switch in the vehicles.

Mr. DeGiorgio approved the new switch in April 2006, according to documents, even though he said in his deposition that he did not “recall ever authorizing such a change.”

In a Senate hearing last week, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) of Missouri said DeGiorgio “lied” under oath. Thursday, she said in a statement that “it’s about time” GM put the two engineers on leave.

“Of the many frustrating moments in our hearing last week, an especially surreal one was learning that the GM employee who had obviously committed perjury hadn't even been suspended and was still on the job in a role with a direct impact on the safety of GM's products,” she said. “This marks a small step in the right direction for GM to take responsibility for poor – and possibly criminal – decisions that cost lives and put millions of American consumers at risk.”

GM is also under fire for missing a deadline last week to answer 107 questions requested by the NHTSA in its investigation. On Wednesday, the agency announced it was fining the automaker $7,000 for every day it fails to comply.

GM, meanwhile, has been trying to show that it is in front of the problem. On Thursday, it announced a program titled “Speak Up for Safety” designed to “remove perceived and real barriers to candid conversations between employees and their leaders as a step to foster a ‘safety first’ culture,” CEO Mary Barra said.

The company is also conducting an internal independent investigation, in addition to asking NASA to send a team to verify that the recalled cars, which include Chevrolet Cobalts and other small 2003 to 2007 model-year vehicles, can safely be driven. When that question came up in Congress last week, Ms. Barra said the vehicles were safe so long as no other keys were attached to the ignition key.

The GM recall, combined with the recall of 6.8 million Toyota vehicles worldwide this year, is likely to push federal regulators to clamp down on the industry. Last year, nearly 31 million vehicles were recalled in the US, according to the NHTSA.

Several members of Congress are suggesting measures to improve auto industry safety.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D) of California wants to add a $3 fee on new vehicles to bolster the NHTSA budget. He also wants to raise potential penalties on automakers from $35 million to as much as $200 million.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D) of Connecticut wants GM to create a $3 billion to $8 billion trust fund that will pay claims related to the defective vehicles.

Consumer advocate Ralph Nader is also asking Congress to introduce the Dangerous Products Warning Act by Rep. John Conyers (D) of Michigan, which would impose criminal liability for managers who knew of defects but failed to warn federal regulators.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Embattled GM suspends two engineers, asks NASA for help
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2014/0410/Embattled-GM-suspends-two-engineers-asks-NASA-for-help
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe