What is #BoycottDolceGabbana? Why anti-gay comments may be bad for business

Italian designers Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana are experiencing backlash with #BoycottDolceGabbana after making comments against same-sex families. Does freedom of expression extend to businesses?

|
Stefano Rellandini/Reuters/File
Italian fashion duo Domenico Dolce (right) and Stefano Gabbana gained criticism after the pair championed "traditional" families.

After making comments critical of same-sex parents, Italian designers Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana may have put their fashion company into dangerous business territory. Their comments have sparked the trending hashtag #BoycottDolceGabbana on Twitter, and it is possible their views may affect sales.

In an interview with Italian publication Panorama, the business partners discussed their views of marriage and childrearing. Despite both being gay – and having been a couple for 23 years before separating in 2005 – they expressed their disagreement with same-sex parenting.

“We oppose gay adoptions. The only family is the traditional one,” the pair said to Panorama, translated by The Telegraph. “Life has a natural flow, there are things that should not be changed.”

Dolce said that childbearing “must be an act of love,” and that naturally a child should be born to a mother and father. He also made comments critical of in vitro fertilization, saying that it is unnatural for humans.

“I call children of chemistry, synthetic children.” he said, according to The Telegraph.

After the article began to gain attention, singer Elton John posted on Instagram his disagreement and disappointment in the pair. He wrote:

“How dare you refer to my beautiful children as synthetic. And shame on you for wagging your judgemental little fingers at IVF — a miracle that has allowed legions of loving people, both straight and gay, to fulfil [sic] their dream of having children. Your archaic thinking is out of step with the times, just like your fashions. I shall never wear Dolce and Gabbana ever again. #BoycottDolceGabbana.”

Elton John was not the only celebrity to promote #BoycottDolceGabbana.

Is it too late for Dolce & Gabbana to recant, and should they have to?

Recently, multiple companies have come out arguing that supporting – and legalizing – gay marriage across the country would be a good business move. Apple, Google, and other tech giants argue that not legalizing and supporting gay marriage results in negative affects to the workforce, such as introducing challenges to recruiting and maintaining the most talented employees in areas that do not support gay rights.

It is not surprising that it works in reverse.

After #BoycottDolceGabbana gained traction, the fashion pair issued a statement in an attempt to explain the thought behind their previous statements.

"We firmly believe in democracy and the fundamental principle of freedom of expression that upholds it," Gabbana said, according to the Huffington Post. "We talked about our way of seeing reality, but it was never our intention to judge other people's choices. We do believe in freedom and love."

Dolce added, after explaining his own experience growing up with both a mother and a father: “This is the reality in which I grew up, but it does not imply that I don't understand different ones. I was talking about my personal view, without judging other people's choices and decisions.”

The pair argued that they are allowed freedom of expression. But consumers are also free to spend their dollars wherever they wish, regardless of that freedom.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What is #BoycottDolceGabbana? Why anti-gay comments may be bad for business
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2015/0316/What-is-BoycottDolceGabbana-Why-anti-gay-comments-may-be-bad-for-business
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe