As long as people will pay exorbitant fees to care for loved ones – even loved pets – health care costs won't react the way economists think they will. Too much is at stake.
Diane Lim Rogers / Economist Mom
My dog, Taco, a (speculated) chihuahua-dachshund-miniature pinscher mix dog I adopted in the fall of 2009 (as an estimated 8-month-old pup), came violently ill late last week from something that was delicious to him but ended up effectively “poisoning” him. (The circumstances under which he got himself into that situation were beyond my control and will not be elaborated on here.) I rushed him to the emergency vet late Friday night after he had very uncharacteristically refused food for over a day and couldn’t even hold down any water.
The emergency facility I took him to was incredible. State-of-the-art technology, the best of trained veterinarians–and even a coffee bar in the waiting room(!). Taco stayed overnight hooked up on IVs to rehydrate and medicate him, and was subjected to a battery of tests to rule out more serious conditions. I received regular, comprehensive updates over the phone and also by email. By Saturday afternoon, I was able to visit him (that’s when the photo above was taken), and by Saturday night–a bit less than 24 hours after his admission–he was able to come home with me.
The bill was a real shocker for me. Nearly exactly equivalent to one month’s rent (which in the DC area isn’t very cheap). And I don’t carry “pet health insurance.” Was it worth it? Of course.