Did the Chilean government officials deliberately create low expectations of their ability to rescue the miners, so that they could later exceed them?
This article about the Chilean miner rescue has a revealing quote. "McAteer said he gave "very high marks" to the Chileans (government officials) for creating lowered expectations by saying that it might take until Christmas to rescue the men — and then consistently delivering results ahead of schedule."
Now keep in mind that Davitt McAteer directed the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration during the Clinton administration.
Mr. McAteer appears to believe in behavioral economics. In his view, a good government official lies to the people to calm them down by providing misinformation and then once they expect nothing -- you surprise the people with an unexpectedly strong performance.
This raises at least two questions. 1. What is the best behavioral econonomics work documenting this effect? 2. Does our government actually follow this policy? Are there any unintended consequences of following such a "let's lower expectations" strategy?
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here.