Are fewer teens interested in driving?

One in three teenagers is 'just not interested' in driving, a new study says. While 20 years ago, more than two-thirds of teens obtained their driver's license before the age of 18, today, only 44 percent of teens have their licenses within their first 12 months of eligibility.

|
Robert Harbison/The Christian Science Monitor/File
Sixteen-year-old Amarveer Brar drives home from high school with his friend Roger Gorog in 2002. Fewer teens are expressing interest in getting their driver's licenses, a new study says.

Less than half of all American teenagers get their first driver's license within a year of becoming eligible to drive, a new study from AAA says.

In stark contrast to 20 years ago, when more than two-thirds of teens got their driver’s license before they turned 18, only 44 percent of today's teens have their first licenses within 12 months of eligibility, according to a new study from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.

The delay of the traditional rite of passage extends even further. The study suggests only 54 percent of teens are obtaining their license before their 18th birthday.

The AAA finds this troubling, saying that teens are missing out on the intended benefits of state graduated licensing laws (GDLs).

In a press release announcing the findings, Peter Kissinger, President and CEO, AAA Foundation for Traffic Study said that one in three teens who delay getting their license until they turn 18 are foregoing opportunities to learn safeguards that GDL provides.

“For most, it’s about not having a car or having alternatives to getting around,” Kissinger said.

"Just not very interested" in driving

Unexpectedly, most teens surveyed aren’t holding off on a driver’s license merely to avoid going through graduated driver licensing. The top ten reasons cited for delaying include:

  • Did not have a car – 44 percent
  • Could get around without driving – 39 percent
  • Gas was too expensive – 36 percent
  • Driving was too expensive – 36 percent
  • “Just didn’t get around to it” – 35 percent
  • Could do what I wanted to do without driving – 32 percent
  • Was nervous about driving – 30 percent
  • Just not very interested in driving – 29 percent
  • Had to complete driver education course first – 28 percent
  • Getting a license was too expensive – 26 percent

The study also revealed large social and economic disparities in licensing: young people who described themselves as black or Hispanic, or were from low-income households, were much less likely than other respondents to have been licensed before age 18.

Opinions about driver licensing policies

Teens surveyed showed surprising opinions about driver licensing, with 77 percent supporting restrictions on novice drivers carrying teen passengers (12 percent say zero should be allowed; 32 percent say one), and 77 percent supporting night-time driving restrictions (51 percent say these should start at 10 p.m. or earlier).

In addition, 28 percent of teens said they support requiring all new drivers, regardless of age, to first obtain a restricted license.

Nearly all, 96 percent, believe age 16 is the youngest a teen should be permitted to get a license that allows independent driving; more than half, 58 percent, say it should be 17.

The AAA concludes that, given the large proportion of drivers who do not become licensed until after they turn 18, “further research is needed to investigate the safety impact of obtaining a license at older vs. younger ages as well as to identify specific risk factors for older novice drivers and ways to address them.”

View the full research report and survey results here (PDF).

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Are fewer teens interested in driving?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2013/0805/Are-fewer-teens-interested-in-driving
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe