Are new fuel-efficient engines less reliable?

Increased engine and transmission problems in newer cars have contributed to a decline in vehicle dependability in J.D. Power's annual Vehicle Dependability Study. There's a worrying correlation between these results and the trend for smaller, more fuel-efficient engines of the last few years, Ingram writes.

|
Rebecca Cook/Reuters/File
A Chevrolet Volt sits next to an electric vehicle charging station outside General Motors world headquarters in Detroit. The Volt, a vehicle that many consider quite complex, shows that efficiency doesn't automatically mean low dependability, Ingram writes.

For the first time in over 15 years, increased engine and transmission problems in 2011 model year cars have contributed to a decline in vehicle dependability in J.D. Power's annual Vehicle Dependability Study.

Ordinarily you might put this down to the luck of the draw--an occasional drop is almost inevitable.

But there's a worrying correlation between these results and the trend for smaller, more fuel-efficient engines of the last few years.

According to J.D. Power's results, there have been ten more reported problems per 100 vehicles for smaller four-cylinder engines than in the previous year's survey--notably more than for older five and six-cylinder engines. 

J.D. Power notes that fuel economy is a primary purchase motivator for many customers, but in striving for greater efficiency, "automakers must be careful not to compromise quality".

There's been a notable increase in problems such as engine hesitation, rough transmission shifts and lack of power with the new units, leading to the new engines' poor showing in the 2013 survey. (MORE: Do Small Turbo Engines Really Give Better Gas Mileage?)

Low dependability has the potential to do more harm than fuel efficient engines do good, too.

J.D. Power says that poor dependability "creates avoidance", with customers more likely to change to a different vehicle next time around if they experience problems with their current car.

If such problems are directly related to newer, high-tech, downsized efficient engines, there's every chance that a customer may be inclined to pick a vehicle with lower efficiency but higher dependability next time around.

Not that it's all bad news for brands touting efficient vehicles: segment winners in this year's study include the Honda Fit, Chevrolet Volt, and the Lexus ES, GS and RX. The Volt in particular, a vehicle that many consider quite complex, shows that efficiency doesn't automatically mean low dependability.

General Motors ranked highly in this year's survey, all its brands finishing above the industry average for low reported problems. Lexus tops the list, by some margin over Mercedes-Benz and Cadillac.

Would low dependability for the latest breed of fuel-efficient four cylinder engines put you off them for your next purchase? Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

_________________________________________

Follow GreenCarReports on FacebookTwitter and Google+

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Are new fuel-efficient engines less reliable?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2014/0217/Are-new-fuel-efficient-engines-less-reliable
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe