Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Why Bank Transfer Day actually helped banks

Bank Transfer Day helps commercial banks by removing less profitable accounts, explains Motley Fool and DCDecoder.

Mother Mimi Ho, right, withdrew her savings from a Wells Fargo Bank as part of the protest in downtown Oakland, Calif.

AP Photo/Paul Sakuma

About these ads

In the third in a weekly series, Decoder and The Motley Fool columnist Morgan Housel discuss the Occupy Wall Street group's plans for Bank Transfer Day.

DCDecoder asks Morgan Housel: Why do you think Bank Transfer Day may end up working out for banks AND customers?

Housel: One of the drivers behind [Bank Transfer Day] is people trying to teach banks a lesson. The irony of that is since the financial crisis, and especially over the last three months as there has been a panic about Europe… banks have been inundated with cash deposits. They’ve been seeing a higher inflow of deposits than they can turn into loans.

That’s putting pressure on their margins because banks have to pay [Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.] premiums and overhead costs. And that’s really accentuated by smaller accounts because in the past banks could earn money [from customers with lower balances] from overdraft fees and debit interchange fees and a lot of that has been scaled down through recent regulations…

People are going to be moving to credit unions, and that’s good for them because they’re going to have lower fees, they’re going to have better service, they’re going to have the feeling that they are investing in their community. And then the banks are going to be better off because they are getting rid of their least-profitable or not profitable clients. It helps them stem this tsunami of cash that’s been flowing in that they don’t know what to do with.

2. Your column last week got picked up by several news outlets as criticism of the Occupy Wall St. protests and the concept of “We Are the 99%”. What did you make of that?

Housel: It really doesn’t surprise me in hindsight that it was interpreted as a hit toward Occupy Wall St. That article was showing that if you make over $34,000 per year, you’re in the top 1 percent in the globe. People say “That’s not fair that you compare me to someone in Africa or someone in India.” The hedge fund manager or the Goldman Sachs banker doesn’t want to compare themselves to someone unemployed in Detroit or a single mother somewhere else. It’s all about your perspective.

Many people were really hesitant to compare themselves to people in the third world without realizing that the 1 percent that they are protesting don’t want to compare themselves to the other 99 percent.


Page:   1   |   2

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.