Fed report finds no one in the US is getting richer. Except the rich.

A just-released study from the Federal Reserve found that declining home values have kept America's middle-income families from advancing alongside their wealthiest neighbors. Only families at the very top of the income distribution saw widespread income gains between 2010 and 2013

|
Michael Dwyer/AP/File
A mailman delivers mail to a house for sale in Quincy, Mass. Falling home values have prevented middle income US families from growing their wealth over the past three years, according to a new Federal Reserve study. Meanwhile, average income jumped for the top 10 percent of households.

As the rich got richer and the poor slid further down the wealth ranks over the past three years, declining home values kept America’s middle-income families from advancing alongside their wealthiest neighbors, according to a just-released Federal Reserve study. On a brighter note, indebted U.S. consumers pared what they owe.

Based on homeowner responses, the average value of residential property dropped 6% from 2010 to last year, while a national residential real estate price index failed to outpace inflation, rising 2% annually, the Fed said, citing its triennial survey of consumer finances. For most families, much of the change in wealth during the past decade stemmed from booms and busts in asset prices, including housing.

“The bust, in particular, had a disproportionate effect on families in the middle of the net worth distribution, whose wealth portfolio is dominated by housing,” Fed economists said in the study. In terms of incomes, families in the midrange “have failed to recover the losses experienced between 2007 and 2010,” they said.

Not so for the wealthiest Americans.

“Only families at the very top of the income distribution saw widespread income gains between 2010 and 2013,” the economists wrote.

Income gain

Among the top 10%, average income jumped 10% while most households reported little change or slight declines and the bottom 10% saw an 8% drop. By comparison, the Fed said the share of all U.S. household income collected by the top 3% of families surged to 30.5% last year from 27.7% in 2010.

And so they grew richer. While the net worth of the top 10% in earnings rose 2% on average, the highest-ranked 3% saw their share of all household wealth climb to 54.4%. For the rest, their slice of the pie fell to 24.7%, led by a 21% drop among the poorest 10%.

For most of the families in between, home values have traditionally been the key to accumulating household wealth. Yet with prices sagging, at least until the past year or so, the rate of home ownership dropped to 65.2%, the lowest level in a generation, according to the Fed. It said the average household wealth derived from housing sank 3.1% from 2010 to $159,400 last year. That’s an almost 28% plunge from $221,000 in 2007. The bottom half of the home-owning public was hardest hit by these declines, the Fed said.

So it’s hardly any mystery why many younger Americans have shied from becoming homeowners, despite historically low mortgage rates. The market bust that led to the Great Recession showed just how risky that asset class can be as millions lost their investment to foreclosure or saw the value of their property drop below what they owed on the mortgage.

Debt mix

While the indebted households reduced what they owed by an average of 13%, much of that came from lower rates of homeownership. By last year, the percentage of households with debt tied to their primary residence slumped to 42.9% from 47% in 2010, while the proportion with education loans increased to 20% and the average amount owed climbed 5% to $28,900 on average. The Fed said the balance outstanding was concentrated in households led by someone under 40 years old.

Consumers with credit card debt sharply reduced the burden, cutting the average owed 25% to $5,700 last year. The Fed said the portion of families carrying balances slipped to 38.1% and the overall debt-to-income ratio for U.S. households fell to 104.6% from 124.7% in 2010.

Measures of debt distress also showed signs of improvement, as the percentage of borrowers with a payment-to-income ratio of over 40% slumped to 8.2%, its lowest level since at least 2001. Those described as credit constrained either because they had been turned down for a loan or didn’t apply because they feared being rejected also declined slightly.

The proportion of households that were late on debt payments also slid. But the number of consumers who took out payday loans – very short-term debt characterized by high fees and astronomical annual interest rates – rose to 4.2% from 3.9%.

So even as home prices rebound in many areas and jobs become more abundant, the economy still hasn’t lifted the fortunes of most Americans, just the wealthiest.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Fed report finds no one in the US is getting richer. Except the rich.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Saving-Money/2014/0905/Fed-report-finds-no-one-in-the-US-is-getting-richer.-Except-the-rich
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe