Could 'charter cities' help poor countries blossom?(Read article summary)
Even when Hong Kong was under British rule, neighboring China benefited from its economy. Would the same model work in the rest of the developing world?
Vincent Yu / AP / File
Adam Smith said that prosperity depends on the rule of law, peace and low taxes. Broadly speaking, this explains why so many countries have failed to grow and are still in extreme poverty. What can we do to change this?
Ideally, to reduce poverty in the developing world, poor countries should run themselves better, but this is easier said than done. Of the things we in the developed world could do, the best would probably be to open our borders, allowing people from poor countries to move here away from their bad governments. Sadly, as much as I’d like that to happen, it’s politically unfeasible right now – even our relatively tiny current levels of around 200,000 immigrants a year (about ⅓ percent of total population) creates huge public anger.
The next best option may be to set up “charter cities” next to poor countries. Basically, the aim would be to set up dozens of new Hong Kongs around the world, allowing open immigration from poor countries into these islands of good governance. Bryan Caplan writes:
The point of charter cities is to peacefully create pockets of high-quality First World governance in the heart of the Third World. How? By persuading Third World governments to create new self-governing cities exempt from most existing laws. These new cities could be governed by foreign law, and administered by foreign governments - or even a for-profit corporation. While the specifics are intentionally flexible, there are three core building blocks of any charter city:
1. An uninhabited piece of city-sized land, provided voluntarily by a host government.
2. A charter that specifies the rules that will govern the new city.
3. The freedom for would-be charter city residents, investors, and employers to move in or out.
I recommend the whole piece. The idea is simple and makes sense – Hong Kong started off as a tiny settlement, but thanks to good governance and immigration it is now one of the world’s central hubs. China benefited economically from its presence even while it was under British rule, and the people there enjoyed enormous prosperity compared to life a few miles away.
A pilot Charter City could be established somewhere in West Africa or the Caribbean, giving people there a chance to move somewhere hospitable to enterprise and economically dynamic. The previous Madagascan president considered it, and Honduras may be close too.
The risk would be insignificant (it is only an empty piece of land to begin with), but the potential upside is enormous – unlocking the talents of millions of people who would otherwise be condemned to a life of subsistence agriculture. The idea that this is ‘cream-skimming’ is wrong – as Bryan says, “most of the world's cream now curdles in backwards farms and dysfunctional slums”.
Hong Kong has helped China progress immensely in terms of policy, as a microcosm of what China could be if it ran itself better. Perhaps African, Latin American and Middle Eastern Hong Kongs could do the same for those regions too, and give poor people a better chance in life.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.