Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Social Security: a target without a cause

Conservative Republicans want to cut Social Security, even though it's not a major contributor to US debt. A better solution to future Social Security shortfalls is a thriving economy.

In this photo taken Feb. 14, 2011, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R) of Wisconsin and the Senate Budget Committee's top Republican, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama (right), deliver the GOP response to President Obama's budget submission for fiscal year 2012, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Mr. Ryan is pushing for cuts in Social Security to deal with its long-term shortfall.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File

About these ads

Before President Obama's State of the Union message Jan. 25, Social Security supporters were "really scared," as one Washington pundit put it. They worried that Mr. Obama would suggest cutting Social Security benefits as a way to trim the massive federal deficit. One liberal analyst, Robert Naiman, even called for citizens to occupy the offices and dog public events of members of Congress who refused to protect the program.

It turned out that Mr. Naiman's "jihad," as he called it, wasn't needed. The president's Social Security proposal is relatively mild and vague. He called for strengthening Social Security for future generations.

But Social Security remains a target of some conservative Republicans. Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the new chairman of the House Budget Committee, states that Social Security is "going broke"; that it faces a $5.4 trillion deficit over the next 75 years, an amount equal to more than one-third of the annual size of the US economy. He maintains that if nothing is done, beneficiaries will face "a painful 22 percent across-the-board benefit cut" in 2037 when the Social Security trust fund is exhausted.


Page:   1   |   2   |   3

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.