Switch to Desktop Site
 
 

Why the demise of the Middle East ‘peace process’ may be a good thing

Next Previous

Page 2 of 5

About these ads

West Bank settlements: 3 factors affecting the pace of Israeli expansion

In a way, this outcome after two decades is not surprising. It was seeded from the outset by Western acquiescence to Israel’s exclusive notion of self-determination in which its own security imperatives confined the space within which Palestinians would have to find their “solution.”

The fiction unveiled, a moment of clarity

The end of the peace process provides a rare moment of stark clarity as the veil drops, revealing the fiction underlying the two-state narrative. The truth is that a “state” was never on offer. Many in Israel were never comfortable with the concept of a Jewish majority state, since this would confer a parity of rights on the minority. The ideology of Zionism – a system of differential rights for Jews and non-Jews – has always been inherently in conflict with the idea of a Jewish majority. A two-state solution would have formalized a non-Zionist Israel as a “majority Jewish state,” as the counterpart to a Palestinian state.

Is Israel a democracy? Five actions in 2010 that fueled the debate

The recognition that a two-state solution is no longer in the cards opens the way to visualizing other paths that don’t depend on the Western mediation.

Next Previous

Page 2 of 5

Share