Letters to the Editor from the weekly print edition of February 6, 2012: One reader says reducing prison populations won't come from releasing criminals, but rehabilitating them and preventing crime. Others praise the recent cover story on the importance of free playtime for children. Another argues the US shouldn't stay in Afghanistan for access to resources or influence in the region.
I found a contradictory message in two pieces from the Jan. 16 issue. One of the stories promoted on the cover ("Progress Watch: Violent Crime") is titled "How serious crime fell in US." It credits part of the reduction to "increased incarceration, including longer sentences, that keeps more criminals off the streets."
In the same issue, however, Arjun Sethi's commentary piece "Four low-cost ways to reduce prison overcrowding" advocates sentence reduction for habitual offenders and urges limiting the use of pretrial detention.
I think I prefer keeping the criminals off the streets. Reductions in prison populations must be driven by education and opportunity (jobs). Once the crime is committed and the perpetrator is on that path, society has a responsibility to keep its citizens safe from those who choose to do it harm.
Regarding the Jan. 23 cover story "Time for play": I find it sad that the existence of schools where children play in kindergarten is not known or mentioned. They exist, and some of the best are the Waldorf schools [in some countries Rudolf Steiner schools]. To enter a Waldorf kindergarten is like entering a child's paradise. Kindergartens are considered the foundation and most important part of these schools.