Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Senate must ratify new START agreement on nuclear arms

The most important reason why the Senate should ratify the US-Russian new START agreement is that without it, America has no way to physically monitor Russia's nuclear forces.

About these ads

The most important thing Americans need to know about the debate over ratifying a “new START” treaty is this: Without it, the United States has no way to physically inspect Russia’s nuclear arsenal. Not any of it.

Imagine, no way to get close and personal with Russian missile silos. No way to get a more accurate count of deployed strategic nuclear weapons. No way to check the number of warheads on individual missiles.

Actually, it’s not a matter of imagination. This has been the sorry situation for almost a year, since the expiration of “old START” – the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty – last December.

That’s a dangerous state of affairs between the world’s two leading nuclear powers. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates rightly make this very point in a Washington Post op-ed today.

The inspection blindness will continue unless the Senate ratifies the new START agreement signed by Presidents Obama and Dmitry Medvedev in April. Senators have the opportunity to approve the treaty in this “lame duck” session. They should seize it.


Page:   1   |   2   |   3

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.