Switch to Desktop Site
 
 

Libya's lessons for NATO – and US defense cuts

NATO airstrikes were critical to Qaddafi's fall, but behind the scenes, the weakness of Europe's militaries and its leadership revealed problems for the US in its prime alliance – and in coming defense cuts.

About these ads

Get ready. America’s big deficit debate revives next month when Congress returns – this time with an intense focus on military cuts. And because US security is based not only on assessing potential foes but also reliable friends, it is time to examine Europe’s role in dispatching Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi from his perch.

Only a few European nations took the lead in the NATO airstrikes on Qaddafi forces, and even they had to ask for additional Pentagon assistance. The Libyan campaign was the first action by the transatlantic alliance that was not led by the United States.

Many of NATO’s 26 European allies sat out the five-month fight, either because they were unwilling to directly participate (notably Germany) or their recent defense cuts made them incapable of joining in (most of them).

Europe’s performance, in other words, was just good enough to aid the rebels’ hard-fought victory but it was an eye-opener for Washington on the sad health of America’s most important military partnership.

Next

Page:   1   |   2   |   3

Share