Americans were united over the weekend on the need for solutions to mass shootings like that at Sandy Hook school in Newtown, Conn. Now they must also deal with their respective fears over the different solutions being proposed.
As happened after the 9/11 attacks, Americans were united for a long moment last Friday when 20 small children and six adults were gunned down at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. The country came together in yearning for ways to prevent yet another mass shooting, especially of children.
This moment of unity should not be forgotten as Americans now seem divided on solutions to stopping such violence. In fact, President Obama was careful in his comments following the tragedy not to lay down specific actions, only to say that “meaningful action” must be taken. He, like many others, has seen how little was done after other mass slaughters in public places.
The Sandy Hook killings had two elements similar to many previous shootings: a shooter in need of mental treatment and the use of powerful – and legal – guns.
Those who oppose more gun regulations focus on the need to deal more effectively with the mentally ill – just as they often say that it is criminals, not guns, who commit violence.
Those who favor more gun regulation say that the easier and quicker path is to tighten controls of the 300 million guns in circulation and curb access to guns by controlling unlicensed, private sellers.
This split is reflected in a Pew Research Center poll that shows 47 percent of Americans support more gun restrictions, while 46 percent favor protection of gun rights. It also showed up over the weekend in reactions by political leaders.
“The more realistic discussion is, how do we target people with mental illness who use firearms?” said Rep. Mike Rogers (R) of Michigan, a former FBI agent. Another Republican congressman, Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas, suggested that the Sandy Hill school officials should have been armed, suggesting the killings could have been prevented that way.