How plants can ease hot temperatures in cities

The presence of vegetation is an essential factor in limiting urban heating, according to a new study that analyzes urbanization impacts across the United States.

|
Sarah Beth Glicksteen/The Christian Science Monitor
A view of the Boston city skyline is seen from the downtown

If you live in a city that gets hot, try surrounding yourself with lots of plants and trees. 

It turns out that when it comes to cities the presence of asphalt, concrete, buildings, and other so-called solid surfaces are disrupting the natural cooling effect provided by vegetation, according to a new study.

Scientists have however long known that temperatures can be as much as 1.8 to 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit warmer in urban areas than surrounding vegetated areas – this is known as the "urban heat island" effect. But what has been less understood is cooling effect of vegetation.

A team led by Lahouari Bounoua, a research scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., used multiple satellite observations of urban areas and their surroundings across the US, and then combined these data into a model to recreate the interaction between vegetation, urbanization, and the atmosphere.

"This has nothing to do with greenhouse gas emissions. It's in addition to the greenhouse gas effect. This is the land use component only," said Mr. Bounoua in a news release.

The scientists also measured the way that vegetation within existing urban areas – along roads, in parks, and in forested neighborhoods – helps to regulate the urban heating effect.

"Everybody thinks, 'urban heat island, things heat up.' But it's not as simple as that. The amount and type of vegetation plays a big role in how much the urbanization changes the temperature," said research scientist and co-author Kurtis Thome of Goddard.

The findings published in the journal Environmental Research Letters state that urban heat island effect occurs primarily during the day when impervious urban surfaces absorb more solar radiation than the surrounding vegetated areas, resulting in a few degrees temperature difference.

The researchers actually found that averaged over the continental United States, areas covered in part by solid surfaces had a summer temperature 1.9 degrees celsius higher than the surrounding rural areas. In winter, the difference was 1.5 degrees celsius higher.

According to the paper, the Northeast I-95 corridor, Baltimore-Washington, Atlanta and the I-85 corridor in the southeast, and the major cities and roads of the Midwest and West Coast show the highest urban temperatures relative to their surrounding rural areas. Smaller cities have less pronounced increases in temperature compared to the surrounding areas.

The paper also determined that, in cities like Phoenix built in the desert, the urban area actually has a cooling effect because of irrigated lawns and trees that wouldn't be there without the city.

"Anywhere in the US small cities generate less heat than mega-cities," Bounoua said. The reason is the effect vegetation has on keeping a lid on rising temperatures.

To help city planners in the future mitigate some of the heating effects, Thome recommended cultivating a better understanding of the tradeoffs between urban surfaces and vegetation.

"Urbanization is a good thing," said Bounoua. "It brings a lot of people together in a small area. Share the road, share the work, share the building. But we could probably do it a little bit better."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How plants can ease hot temperatures in cities
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/0826/How-plants-can-ease-hot-temperatures-in-cities
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe