A tale of two states: How Kansas and Oklahoma have dealt with earthquakes

Two states rattled by human-induced earthquakes choose different tactics with different results. In Oklahoma, people are getting worried what the future could hold if increasing quakes aren't stopped.

|
Bryan Terry/The Oklahoman/AP
Stillwater resident Angela Spotts shouts during and an earthquake forum hosted by state Rep. Lewis Moore (R), at the University of Central Oklahoma in Edmond, Okla., on Thursday. Angry residents in this Oklahoma City suburb chastised policymakers on Thursday for not taking action sooner to restrict oil and gas wastewater injection wells that have been linked to a dramatic rise in earthquakes.
|
Doug Hoke/The Oklahoman/AP/File
Remains of a collapsed chimney rest on the ground outside a home in Edmond, Okla., following an earthquake, Dec. 29. In Oklahoma the stronger and more frequent earthquakes have people worrying about the big one. In Oklahoma, now the country’s earthquake capital, people are talking nervously about the big one as man-made quakes get stronger, more frequent and closer to major population centers.

The Earth is shaking in Oklahoma and Kansas and the quakes are human-induced. But the two states have taken different approaches to remedy the problem.

Earthquakes caused by oil and gas drilling companies disposing of wastewater by pumping it back into the ground have been rattling the neighboring states. To still the shaking, a year ago Kansas decided to regulate how much and how fast the wastewater is injected into the Earth, in line with the results of early scientific studies. At the same time, Oklahoma started by limiting how deep that wastewater could be pumped. 

While Kansas is feeling steadier, with an average of three quakes a month down from 11, by midday on Monday Oklahoma had already had 88 earthquakes of magnitude 2.7 or stronger since the beginning of this year. Eight of those quakes reached a magnitude of 4 or higher.

And the tremors are getting more frequent. From the second half of 2014 to the second half of 2015, Oklahoma saw a 10 percent increase of earthquakes of magnitude 2.7 or stronger. Over the same timeframe, Kansas saw a decrease by 60 percent.

Although the earthquakes haven't reached fatal magnitudes and have caused limited damage and power outages, residents are worried that a big one could be coming.

Seismologists say it's unlikely the region will see such disastrous quakes, but still Cornell University geophysicist Katie Keranen told the Associated Press, "It's a trend that's unsettling." These frequent smaller earthquakes could be a signal of bigger ones to come. "You have the ingredients you need to have a larger earthquake," she said.

US Geological Survey seismologist Nicholas van der Elst said that since southern Kansas and northern Oklahoma are identical geologically, the pair of states has become "a very interesting experiment." 

And experts told the Associated Press that the pattern seen in the two states matches scientific studies that say injecting high volumes of wastewater could stir movement in existing faults. 

The wastewater in question is a mix of underground saltwater that rises to the Earth's surface along with oil and gas during drilling, and the liquid chemicals used in drilling. 

Although drilling companies have been pumping this wastewater back into the Earth for decades, recent technological advances means a higher volume of wastewater can be injected faster. And the amount of wastewater disposed this way more than tripled from 2012 to 2014 in Oklahoma's six most earthquake-prone counties.

"It's a combination of putting fluid in fast enough and deep enough," Stanford University geophysicist William Ellsworth said about the conditions for these quakes. "The higher rate wells are the ones where there are more hazards associated."

Oklahoma has added some volume cutbacks since their initial regulations in March 2015 that focused only on depth. "I like what we've been doing so far, but clearly we need to do more," Oklahoma's energy and environment secretary, Michael Teague, said.

But economics plays a role. Kim Hatfield, president of Oklahoma City-based Crawley Petroleum and a member of the governor's task force studying the earthquake problem said, "A lot of people say we just need the earth to stop shaking, and I understand that, but the fact of the matter is that without the ability to dispose of wastewater, we cannot produce oil and gas in the state of Oklahoma, and this is our lifeblood."

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A tale of two states: How Kansas and Oklahoma have dealt with earthquakes
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2016/0119/A-tale-of-two-states-How-Kansas-and-Oklahoma-have-dealt-with-earthquakes
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe