Storm continues to swirl around Climategate, as multiple investigations get under way(Read article summary)
Climategate isn't going away. A storm of controversy over hacked global warming e-mails still swirls and has caused East Anglia and Penn State Universities to launch investigations.
When e-mails of climate scientists hacked from a British University were published online, the reverberations were heard around the world.
Skeptics of human-caused climate change were elated: Several of the e-mails could be read to indicate that data wasÂ inaccurateÂ or fudged, and some seemed to imply collusion about who and what was posted about global warming in peer-reviewed journals.
A couple of weeks later, the controversy continues to swirl like a tornado. Even Jon Stewart has weighed in on it.
Among the latest news, the University of East Anglia announced an independent reviewer of the e-mails and outlined exactly what he would investigate.
According to MSNBC, the university said Sir Muir would also review:
CRUâ€™s policies and practices for acquiring, assembling, subjecting to peer review and disseminating data and research findings, and their compliance or otherwise with best scientific practice.
CRUâ€™s compliance or otherwise with the Universityâ€™s policies and practices regarding requests under the Freedom of Information Act (â€˜the FOIAâ€™) and the Environmental Information Regulations (â€˜the EIRâ€™) for the release of data.
Review and make recommendations as to the appropriate management, governance and security structures for CRU and the security, integrity and release of the data it holds.
In a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency, the lawmakers requested that a pending move to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act be halted, along with plans to limit emissions from vehicles, power plants and other sources, "until the agency can demonstrate the science underlying these regulatory decisions has not been compromised."
It's unlikely that any of these investigations will be speedy. A PSU spokesman says that its look into Mann's e-mails could take "quite some time." And the English report isn't expected until spring.
At the Freakonomics blog, Stephen Dubner says, "itâ€™s far too early to say," adding that he "senses that there are many other shoes to still be dropped."
Editorâ€™s note: For articles about the environment, see the Monitorâ€™s main environment page, which offers information on many topics. Also, check out our Bright Green blog archive and our RSS feed.
You can also follow Judy on Twitter.