SolarCity IPO share price slashed. Cloudy skies ahead for solar?

SolarCity IPO saw a steep price cut Wednesday. SolarCity is one of the leading US installers of residential solar panels, so why are investors getting cold feet?

|
Tony Avelar/The Christian Science Monitor/File
Jose Zuinga, senior installer for SolarCity, prepares to install solar panels on the roof of a home in Palo Alto, Calif., in this 2011 file photo. SolarCity announced Wednesday Dec. 12, 2012, it will reduce the price of its IPO shares to $8 apiece, instead of an expected $13 to $15 per share.

The business outlook for SolarCity Corp. dimmed this week.

The installer of residential solar systems postponed its much-anticipated announcement of its initial public offering Tuesday, only to sharply reduce its share price in announcing its IPO the following day. 

Instead of the $13 to $15 per share price it previously expected, SolarCity now says it will sell its IPO shares at $8 apiece, according to a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission Wednesday. The San Mateo, Calif.,-based company also announced it would offer 11.5 million shares of stock, up from 10.1 million shares. The IPO could be floated later this week. 

The price reduction cuts the company's previously estimated value of nearly $1 billion almost in half, to about $584.6 million. 

SolarCity is regarded as one of the country's most promising cleantech companies, with revenues more than quadrupling in the last five years. So why the cold feet?

"There was clearly lack of institutional demand at the original asking price," Theo O'Neil, managing director of Litchfield Hills Research, told the San Jose Mercury News. "The institutions are clearly interested in a lower price, and it is up to Elon [Musk, chairman of SolarCity] and the rest to take a lower price or punt."

SolarCity may suffer from an association fallacy. The six-year-old company has flourished where others have floundered. Earlier this year BrightSource Energy, a solar thermal start-up, nixed its IPO amid waning investor interest. High-profile bankrupt Solyndra has become the pariah of a US solar industry flooded with inexpensive Chinese technology. The San Francisco Chronicle points out that SolarCity has remained sheltered from some of the turbulence, largely thanks to it being a provider – not a producer – of solar panels.

Solar installation, actually, is booming. The industry's primary trade association reported Tuesday a record year for installed solar energy capacity – anticipating a 70 percent jump over 2011.  

The Solar Energy Industries Association estimates a record 3.2 gigawatts – enough electricity to power more than half a million average US homes – was installed in 2012. Residential, commercial, and utility-scale solar systems have all seen significant growth, according to SEIA, due largely to dropping prices and the market stability provided by an investment tax credit in place through 2016.

Rhone Resch, CEO and president of SEIA, told reporters in a phone call Tuesday that he expects solar growth to be even better in 2013.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to SolarCity IPO share price slashed. Cloudy skies ahead for solar?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2012/1212/SolarCity-IPO-share-price-slashed.-Cloudy-skies-ahead-for-solar
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe