Ernest Moniz confirmed unanimously as Energy secretary

Ernest Moniz earned bipartisan approval Thursday as the Senate voted 97-0 to confirm the nuclear physicist as the next secretary of the Department of Energy. The support for Ernest Moniz is in contrast to divided opinions over Gina McCarthy, President Obama's pick to head the EPA.

|
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP/File
Energy Secretary nominee Ernest Moniz testifies at his nomination hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington last month. With a background in both government and science, Mr. Moniz is seen as a departure from his predecessor, Steven Chu.

The US Senate unanimously confirmed Ernest Moniz as Energy secretary Thursday.

The bipartisan approval of the nuclear physicist comes in contrast to divided opinions over the fate of another key member of President Obama's second-term energy and environment team. Citing transparency concerns, Republican lawmakers have sought to stall the nomination of Gina McCarthy, Mr. Obama's pick to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

With a background in both government and science, Mr. Moniz is seen as a departure from his predecessor, Steven Chu. Moniz served as under secretary of the Department of Energy between 1997 and 2001. Prior to his nomination, he was the director of the Energy Initiative at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Mass. Moniz also served on President Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

In his confirmation hearing last month, Moniz stressed the importance of a diverse, balanced energy portfolio. He is expected to be the flag-bearer of President Obama's "all-of-the-above" energy policy, a strategy he openly embraces. Research and development should be "first and foremost," he said, in the Department's work towards a clean-energy future. 

In the past, environmentalists have objected to Moniz's views on hydraulic fracturing and natural gas. He says natural gas will serve as a "bridge fuel" to a carbon-free economy. For some environmental groups, it means an unnecessary and continued reliance on fossil fuels.  

"Natural gas is a dirty, dangerous fossil fuel, which poses serious health risks due to air and water pollution from fracking and releases large quantities of methane – a gas that has more than 70 times the climate impact of carbon dioxide," Deb Nardone, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Natural Gas Campaign, said in a statement Thursday. “To do what is right by the American public, we need Secretary Moniz to go all in on smart energy and climate solutions, like solar, wind, and energy efficiency and to protect our children’s health and future, while creating jobs for American workers."

That's easier said than done. Moniz will inherit a department embroiled in controversies over recent federal loans to failed clean-energy companies. He will play a major role in an important decision about if and how to open up the country's vast natural gas resources to world markets. He will probably see his budget slashed as the sequester and potential further spending cuts play out. That's in contrast to the wealth of stimulus funding Secretary Chu had to work with at the start of his tenure. 

He has reason to be upbeat, though. The cost of photovoltaics has dropped dramatically recently, putting solar energy within reach for many people. Tesla Motors, a DOE-backed electric car company, is the current darling of the industry. A revolution in drilling techniques has opened up vast domestic resources of oil and gas. 

Moniz also has support in the energy industry.

"Secretary Moniz understands the energy revolution underway in the United States," Jack Gerard, president and chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, said in a statement Thursday. "New technology and the use of that technology are showing we have vastly more energy potential than we thought we had even just a short time ago."

The outlook for Ms. McCarthy, Obama's EPA nominee, is less certain. Republicans staged a boycott of her committee vote last week, accusing the EPA of not responding to questions about the nominee. The committee met again Thursday and voted 10-8 in favor. Her nomination now goes to the Senate floor, where Republicans could stage a filibuster.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Energy: The next secretary of Energy will have to carry out President Obama's 'all-of-the-above' approach to energy policy in an era of tight budgets.

Environment: Funding priorities for the Department of Energy help chart the course towards a low-emission economy.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Ernest Moniz confirmed unanimously as Energy secretary
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2013/0516/Ernest-Moniz-confirmed-unanimously-as-Energy-secretary
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe