Harvard and Bill Gates targeted: What's behind the fossil fuel divestment push?

2. Why divest from fossil fuels?

The burning of fossil fuels to produce energy makes up the vast majority of the heat-trapping emissions scientists say are responsible for rising average temperatures. In order to stay within a safe temperature range, most scientists agree that emissions must be reduced. It’s why divestment supporters say that holding stocks in fossil fuel companies is bad both for the environment and for long-term economic growth. 

In financial terms, some investors worry that if government regulation or other restrictions prevent major energy firms from tapping the full extent of their fossil fuel reserves, it could burst a “carbon bubble” somewhere down the road. But major oil firms have rejected the idea that vast swaths of oil, gas, and coal will become “stranded assets,” citing growing energy needs across the developing world. 

2 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.