Putting a price on cheap energy [Recharge]

An IMF study examines global energy subsidies; China cuts back on coal; World leaders set the table for Paris climate talks. Catch up on global energy with the Monitor's Recharge.

|
Beawiharta/Reuters/File
A worker at a state-owned Pertamina, Indonesia's main retailer of subsidized fuel, holds a a hose at a petrol station in Jakarta last November.

Recharge is a weekly e-mail digest of energy news and analysis written by Monitor reporters David J. Unger and Jared Gilmour.

$5.3 trillion: Cheap energy isn’t so cheap. Researchers at the IMF this week saidglobal fuel subsidies amount to roughly 6.5 percent of the world’s GDP, although their analysis uses an unusually generous definition of “subsidy.” In addition to the usual direct government support, they include the uncounted environmental cost of our consumption, which has led to some semantic pushback. But regardless of exactly how much the world does or doesn’t subsidize energy, most economists say these kinds of policies distort markets, hurt the environment, and disproportionately benefit the rich.

War on coal: China is losing its reputation as a secure home for coal’s future. Last year, coal-fired power generation in the world's top emitter dropped for the first time since 1974, according to Bloomberg, and prices are plummeting amid the weaker demand. A swath of coal plant retirements are planned as President Xi Jinping aims to meet his goal of peaking emissions by 2030. But even as China slowly eases back on the world’s dirtiest fuel, India is picking up the slack.

Countdown: There are just under 200 days left before world leaders convene in Paris for highly anticipated climate negotiations. Investors and business leaders marked the occasion in Paris this week, underscoring the private sector’s increasing role in decarbonization and global climate talks. At the Petersberg Climate Dialogue in Berlin, Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel and other leaders renewed calls for a shift to low-carbon technologies. Meanwhile, the UN’s Green Climate Fund is beginning to dole out cash, but the fund has struggled to convert pledges into actual money.

In the pipeline

 

Drill deeper

Santa Barbara oil spill raises questions about California pipelines [The Christian Science Monitor]
Green groups claim last week’s oil pipeline spill off the coast of Santa Barbara raises red flags about other pipelines – namely, those that would carry Canadian tar sands to US West Coast refineries. But pipelines are safer than alternatives like rail transport for oil. Experts say rail cars have over 10 times the accident rate of pipelines per billion barrels transported.

Oil's Well in Central Asia [Foreign Affairs]
China and Russia see an opportunity to win influence in Central Asia by tapping the region’s vast hydrocarbon resources. Cheap oil and Russia’s deteriorating ties with the West make for even more complex jockeying for control of oil and gas supply.

Thirty Million Gallons Under the Sea [Harper’s]
“When another expedition comes here in a hundred or a thousand years, they will say, ‘Ah, okay. Here is the 2010 oil spill,’ ” a microbiologist tells Antonia Juhasz, en route to the site of the BP oil spill on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico.

Energy sources

  • Saudi Arabian Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi via Wall Street Journal: "You say decarbonize. Are you willing to have me go back home and shut all the oil wells? Can you afford that today? What will happen to the [oil] price if today I remove 10 million barrels per day of the market ... Where would the western civilization be today if it was not for fossil fuels yesterday?"
  • Wood Mackenzie: "[South African utility Eskom] has been forced to implement three stages of load shedding during the first half of 2015, reducing supply by up to 4GW. And, with seasonal electricity demand increases expected over the next few months, load shedding requirements are likely to become even more pressing."
  • Saudi Arabian Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi via Bloomberg: "In Saudi Arabia we recognize that eventually, one of these days, we’re not going to need fossil fuels … I don’t know when -- 2040, 2050 or thereafter. So we have embarked on a program to develop solar energy … Hopefully, one of these days, instead of exporting fossil fuels, we will be exporting gigawatts of electric power."

Unplug

"Nonpetroleum share of transportation energy at highest level since 1954"

– EIA

Recharge is a weekly e-mail digest of energy news and analysis written by Monitor reporters David J. Unger and Jared Gilmour.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Putting a price on cheap energy [Recharge]
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy/2015/0526/Putting-a-price-on-cheap-energy-Recharge
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe