Google reaches deal with EU to avoid $5 billion fine

But this isn't the end of legal battles for Google in the tech-wary EU.

|
Cathal McNaughton/Reuters/File
The Google offices in Dublin. Google, Apple, and several other tech companies are settling a lawsuit that alleges secret no-poaching policies that hurt software engineer's mobility and pay.

Turns out anti-trust laws can tame even the toughest of tech giants.

On Wednesday, Google agreed to amend its search-engine tactics in the European Union to allow for more favorable search results by its competitors. The move meant Google avoided a $5 billion fine.

For the past three years, the European Commission has investigated Google under suspicion that the site was favoring its search results over competitors.

Under its new proposal, Google will now have to show three competitors’ search results in the similar way it shows its own when promoting specialized search services (such as shopping or hotels). It also must clearly label search results that come from its own services in order to ensure customers know what is sponsored content.

“A shopping search for a gas grill, for example, would yield two boxes of the same size and position at the top of the search results page, one showing three ‘Google shopping results’ and immediately to the left of it three results labeled ‘Alternatives,’ ” according to Bloomberg Businessweek, citing an example provided by the EU Commission.

According to comScore, a consultant group, Google has a 75 percent share of the European search market.

This is Google’s third proposal to the EU to solve this issue. The first two were deemed inadequate, but did make some concessions, according to a EU Commission press release, including:

  • Giving content providers the option to opt-out of Google’s specialized search engines without penalty from Google
  • Remove exclusivity requirements in agreements with publishers for search advertisement provisions
  • Remove restrictions on search advertising campaigns running on competing search advertising platforms

However, the EU Commission deemed the concessions acceptable before checking with competitors, which has upset Google's rivals.

"A settlement without third party review is a massive failure," says Microsoft-backed Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace in a statement. "Hard data from market tests proved that the previous settlement would not work – we need time and opportunity to ensure full technical assessment of how effective the proposed remedies would be."

However, Joaquín Almunia, commission vice president of competition policy, says the EU commission deemed the changes adequate and didn’t see the need to seek outside guidance.

"My mission is to protect competition to the benefit of consumers, not competitors,” he says in a statement. “Without preventing Google from improving its own services, [the proposal] provides users with real choice between competing services presented in a comparable way; it is then up to them to choose the best alternative. This way, both Google and its rivals will be able and encouraged to innovate and improve their offerings."

A similar investigation by the US Federal Trade Commission took place last year, but it was dropped before charges were filed.

This isn’t the end of the legal road for Google, however. Mr. Almunia says the investigation of Google’s Android software (which lobbying groups have accused of directing traffic to Google products) is ongoing.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Google reaches deal with EU to avoid $5 billion fine
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2014/0205/Google-reaches-deal-with-EU-to-avoid-5-billion-fine
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe