Switch to Desktop Site
 
 

Facebook privacy changes, aimed at openness, may trigger the opposite

(Read article summary)
Image

Facebook screengrab

(Read caption) Facebook's new privacy policy gives users more control, but will they use it? Or overuse it?

About these ads

Uh-oh, Facebook's made another change.

With Wednesday's privacy policy revision (and the unsaid truth that if users take no action their updates will be posted for the entire Internet to see) Facebook may be opening the door to its own downfall.

How so?

When the site was founded, it brought users with preexisting offline connections together – initially just colleges, then companies, high schools, and regions.

As it announced it would last week, today Facebook did away with regional networks. And If they haven't already, all 350 million of the site's users will soon see a dialog box that will require them to review the site's new privacy controls and use a "transition tool" to help translate their current privacy settings into terms that mesh with the new policy.

What's changed? And why?

In addition to the demise of regional networks, Facebook today introduced more "granular" controls on what information is shared and with whom. Functions like photos or status updates may be set to post only to specific users, just friends, friends of friends, or to everyone, which is now the default setting. And "everyone" now means not just all of Facebook, but the public Web as well. In a sense, Facebook is clearing out its 'walled garden' and making users ask to move back inside.

In the days since Facebook's founding, the success of Twitter has created massive interest in real-time search. Twitter was the go-to search engine for people looking for information on the death of Michael Jackson, the crash of a US Airways jet into the Hudson, and other recent breaking news stories. Facebook sees millions of similar posts fly across its site everyday and wants to bring its gargantuan user base to the party. But throwing the switch to public without very clearly telling its users could be a recipe for disaster.

Backlash?

Next

Page:   1   |   2

Share