Sprint ends bid to acquire T-Mobile. Why the change of heart?

Sprint has dropped its bid to acquire T-Mobile US and has announced that Marcelo Claure, founder of the wireless company Brightstar Corp., will become Sprint's next president and chief executive officer. 

|
Brendan McDermid/Reuters/File
A woman talks on her phone as she walks past T-mobile and Sprint wireless stores in New York in 2009.

Sprint has halted its bid to acquire T-Mobile US, an acquisition designed to counter a US wireless market currently dominated by Verizon and AT&T by combining the third and fourth-largest US wireless companies. 

This change of heart – first reported Tuesday by The Wall Street Journal, citing "people familiar with the matter" – is a result of opposition from federal regulators who want to see four competitive players in the US wireless market. Sprint shares fell 19 percent on Wednesday, while T-Mobile shares fell 10 percent. 

Now, Sprint is making moves to improve its company's culture after years of losing customers. 

"Four national wireless providers is good for American consumers," Federal Communications Commission chairman Tom Wheeler said in an e-mailed statement to The Wall Street Journal. "Sprint now has an opportunity to focus their efforts on robust competition."

To do this, Sprint announced Wednesday that Marcelo Claure, founder of the wireless company Brightstar Corp., will serve as the company's next president and chief executive officer, succeeding Dan Hesse, who has served as president since 2007. 

Sprint has pursued T-Mobile US, whose majority owner is the German telecommunications company Deutsche Telekom, for the past nine months. That pursuit was spearheaded by the Japanese businessman Masayoshi Son, whose telecommunications company SoftBank controls Sprint. Mr. Son's goal was to build a rival to Verizon and AT&T that could have the "the financial power and airwaves to serve more customers and eventually deliver faster broadband to consumers more cheaply than cable," Bloomberg reports. Just last month, the two companies were discussing a potential $32 billion deal, according to The New York Times. 

But the FCC believes consumers, particularly those not able to pay larger wireless fees, would have been poorly served by such a merger. As The Journal reports, three years ago the FCC and Justice Department did not allow AT&T to acquire T-Mobile for $39 billion. 

While Sprint is gearing up to revamp its company culture, which Son has referred to as having a "loser" mentality, it is unclear what the future of T-Mobile will be. Deutsche Telekom, The Times reports, has indicated it wants to sell off its stake in T-Mobile. But with the Sprint deal off the table, it may be on the market for other potential buyers. Just last week, it was reported that the French upstart wireless carrier Iliad had made a $15 billion cash offer for a 56.6 percent stake in T-Mobile US. Though Deutsche Telekom reportedly turned that offer down, it's possible that with Sprint out of the picture, Iliad could make another offer. 

Still, it would seem neither Sprint nor T-Mobile is willing to completely abandon plans of a potential merger. But given the Obama administration's determination to prevent the merger, it's unlikely to happen any time soon. 

"We didn't think the opposition would be this strong," a SoftBank executive told Reuters, adding: "The environment will definitely change."

T-Mobile, led by the eccentric chief executive John Legere, has marketed itself to consumers as the "Uncarrier," requiring no annual service contracts and offering low-cost pricing plans. It reported its first net-profit in a year in the second quarter, according to Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Sprint ends bid to acquire T-Mobile. Why the change of heart?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/Horizons/2014/0806/Sprint-ends-bid-to-acquire-T-Mobile.-Why-the-change-of-heart
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe