Comet's fiery plunge may tell us how planets form

For the first time, scientists have caught a glimpse of a comet's final minutes before it was vaporized by the sun. The comet was flying at about 1.4 million miles an hour.

|
SOHO (ESA & NASA)
Comet C/2011 N3 plunges towards the Sun in front of the SOHO's LASCO C2 camera in July 2011. The Sun's bright light is blocked out by a coronagraph.

For the first time, scientists have caught a comet in the Icarus-like act of zipping too close to the sun – and watched as it paid the ultimate price.

In catching a glimpse of the comet's final vaporization, researchers not only have been able to piece together a detailed picture of the comet itself – something usually reserved for spacecraft fly-bys. They also may have a found a way to use similar comets as test dummies for making key measurements of the sun's atmosphere, or corona.

And by throwing the break-up process into reverse, they may be able to answer a nagging question tied to the formation of planets in the solar system some 4.5 billion years ago: How does the clumping process that gathers tiny dust grains into ever bigger lumps and finally to planet-size objects really work?

The comet observations, published in the Jan. 20 issue of the journal Science, "are pioneering a new form of cometary study," writes Carey Lisse, a researcher at the Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md.

The comet, C/2011 N3, was discovered July 4, 2011, a scant two days before its demise, as researchers looked at data from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spacecraft, a joint NASA-European Space Agency project.

Sun-grazing comets, such as C/2011 N3, are nothing new to SOHO. It has observed more than 2,100 of them, according to NASA. It finds them with an instrument designed to mask the sun's disk so the instrument can observe the glowing corona.

But that's also a problem. Sun-grazers SOHO sees vanish behind this mask. And like Las Vegas, what goes on behind the mask stays behind the mask.

It took data from three craft – SOHO, as well as NASA's STEREO and Solar Dynamics Observatory – to piece together the full picture of C/2011 N3's final 20 minutes.

The C/2011 N3 belongs to a family known as Kreutz sungrazers – a vast collection of comet fragments thought to have come from the break-up of a larger comet around 2,500 years ago. Scientists estimate that the parent object's nucleus was as large as 60 miles across. Comet Halley, which makes its closest approach to the sun every 75 years, has a nucleus roughly 7 miles across.

Based on its observations, the team, led by Lockheed Martin Corporation solar physicist Karel Schrijver, estimates that C/2011 N3 was hurtling toward the sun at about 1.4 million miles an hour – fast enough to turn a three-day trip to the moon into a four-hour sprint. When it vanished, it had closed within 62,000 miles of the sun's surface.

The comet – with a nucleus up to 300 feet across and weighing about 70,000 tons – spawned a tail some 10,000 miles long during its final approach. Both the tail and the coma – an 800-mile-wide halo of dust and gas surrounding the nucleus – shone bright in the images the team gathered.

That in itself is a puzzle, according to Dean Pesnell, project scientist for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

The set of small telescopes on SDO that picked up the comet are designed to operate at wavelengths of light that correspond to temperatures of 1 million degrees, Dr. Pesnell says. Material that comes off the comet is around 300 degrees.

"You look at that and you say: I'm not ever going to see this stuff from a comet," he says.

Indeed, "we expected to see no other heavenly body" in the telescopes SDO uses, adds Pesnell, a member of the team that observed the comet's demise.

So why did C/2011 N3 shine so bright?

Researchers are looking at a couple of possible explanations: either material itself heats directly and quickly as the comet sheds it, or it heats and brightens the surrounding corona via friction.

Kreutz family comets are so numerous that they appear at the sun on average about once every three days. "We just need to get a couple more big ones" to help answer the question, Pesnell says.

These events also could help scientists reverse-engineer the vanishing comets to reveal in some detail how they are built. That, in turn, could shed light on initial processes that form comets, asteroids, and planets, suggests Johns Hopkins's Dr. Lisse.

Simulations and lab experiments suggest that tiny dust grains and gas molecules readily gather into clumps up to a half an inch across, he notes. But once they grow larger, they tend to crumble on contact with one another, or merely bounce off of each other. That should put a break on forming anything much larger than a mid-sized marble.

Yet with objects a half a mile across or larger, gravitational accretion goes to work building larger bodies. And the solar system is loaded with them – from small asteroids to Jupiter.

Deconstructing a comet may help explain how nature bridges this "aggregation gap," Lisse suggests.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Comet's fiery plunge may tell us how planets form
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0120/Comet-s-fiery-plunge-may-tell-us-how-planets-form
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe