Curiosity's Mars landing on track, say scientists

NASA's Curiosity is scheduled to land on Mars on Sunday. A dust storm and a wobble have added complexity to the mission, but scientists say, 'we will get there and get there safely.'

|
AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes
Engineers work on a model of the Mars rover Curiosity at the Spacecraft Assembly Facility at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.

A dust storm on Mars and a minor wobble in the spacecraft’s trajectory have given scientists something to think about, but leaders of NASA’s Curiosity mission said Thursday that they are on track for a Sunday landing — the delivery of the largest and most ambitious machine ever sent to another planet.

“Things are almost too quiet,” Pete Theisinger, the mission’s project manager, said Thursday at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Canada Flintridge as Curiosity barreled toward Mars at 7,987 mph. “I’m waiting for the other shoe to drop.”

Curiosity, a roving lab that will scour Mars for the ingredients of life, is scheduled to land Sunday in an ancient geological feature known as the Gale Crater. It is a complex operation. At 1,982 pounds, Curiosity is five times heavier than previous Mars rovers. Its landing requires a dizzying sequence of pyrotechnics and on-the-fly adjustment, all done automatically because Mars is 154 million miles distant, too far for the swift communication needed to guide the landing from Earth.

At a briefing Thursday, scientists said satellites had discovered a dust storm swirling south of Gale Crater. Earlier this week, the storm was more than 600 miles from Curiosity’s landing site but large enough that it could kick up a pesky cloud of dust.

In theory, that could affect the accuracy of Curiosity’s landing mechanism, but scientists said the craft had been engineered to guard against nasty weather and that storms like this are common and typically dissipate in a day or two. To pose a real threat, Theisinger said, “it would have to be the great-grandmother of all dust storms.”

Scientists also determined in recent weeks that Curiosity was on course to hit the Martian atmosphere about 13 miles east of the optimal “entry point.” Last weekend, they conducted a routine trajectory correction — a “burn,” in pop-science parlance. The operation was a success, but imperfect. The spacecraft’s new trajectory will send it into the Martian atmosphere at a point roughly 3,000 feet from where scientists had planned after the correction.

However, Curiosity’s landing target is an ellipse of land 12 miles wide, allowing for considerable wiggle room. What’s more, the craft has been equipped with a self-correcting navigation system called “guided entry” — thrusters that can correct miles’ worth of error in trajectory.

Adam Steltzner, a leader of the JPL team overseeing the spacecraft’s landing, said an error of just 3,000 feet could easily be “flown out” — absorbed by the sophisticated navigation system. Scientists have two other opportunities for corrective “burns,” but said it was unlikely they would use them.

“We are doing everything we can to make sure that we are going to the right place,” said Tomas Martin-Mur, the mission’s navigation team chief. “I am confident that we will get there and get there safely.”

Also Thursday, scientists revealed that Curiosity already has delivered results, even before it lands.

Curiosity’s instruments are expected to yield a new understanding of Mars’ history and environment. The mission’s impact doesn’t end there, however. Curiosity is also expected to pave the way for future Mars missions, including the first human exploration. President Obama has set a goal of sending an astronaut to Mars by the 2030s.

That would be no small matter. Rather than the three days it took to reach the moon, an astronaut would endure a nine-month trip there and then another one to get home. Scientists are still trying to understand how they might guard against radiation astronauts would encounter. It’s a critical issue. Carrying a proper radiation shield would be both vital and burdensome.

Curiosity was equipped with a device, known as RAD, to measure radiation once the craft arrives. Mars, because of its thin atmosphere and weak magnetic field, lacks the ability to repel or absorb radiation, a trait that could have affected the planet’s ability to foster life.

About a year ago, scientists realized they could turn RAD on early, that they didn’t need to wait for Curiosity to get to Mars. The instrument was turned on 10 days after launch and was active for most of the spacecraft’s 81/2-month journey to Mars. It has already sent home a significant amount of data.

RAD measured radiation encountered by Curiosity along the way, outside the craft and inside, where an astronaut would be housed during a human-exploration “cruise.”

Although scientists are still digesting the data, early indications are that radiation outside the spacecraft carrying Curiosity was perhaps 100 times higher than inside the craft. Still, levels inside might have been a full fifth of the amount of radiation that NASA allows its astronauts to face over the course of their career — “not a full, lifetime dose, but not insignificant,” said Don Hassler, RAD’s principal investigator. A better understanding of deep-space radiation could help determine everything from spacecraft construction to when a human-exploration mission might launch to limit an astronaut’s exposure.

©2012 Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Distributed by MCT Information Services

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Curiosity's Mars landing on track, say scientists
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0802/Curiosity-s-Mars-landing-on-track-say-scientists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe