Neil Armstrong remembered as a 'reluctant American hero'

Neil Armstrong, the first human to set foot on the moon, never embraced his celebrity status, say colleagues and family members of the astronaut who died Saturday.

|
NASA/Andy Chaikin/collectSPACE.com
On July 20, 1969, Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk on the moon. Armstrong is pictured here, shortly after collecting a sample of lunar dust and rocks. At his feet is the handle for the sample collection tool.

Neil Armstrong may be one of the most famous people who ever lived, but he was a modest man who didn't seek out the spotlight, say those who knew the late astronaut.

Armstrong died Saturday (Aug. 25) at the age of 82 of complications from a recent cardiac bypass operation. He shot to international fame on July 20, 1969, when he became the first person to set foot on the moon.

But the commander of NASA's Apollo 11 mission, and the first person ever to walk on the surface of another world, didn't glory in his iconic moment, viewing it instead as all in a day's work, family members said.

"Neil was our loving husband, father, grandfather, brother and friend," the Armstrong family said in a statement Saturday. "Neil Armstrong was also a reluctant American hero who always believed he was just doing his job."

Keeping a low profile

As his boot pressed into the gray lunar dirt 43 years ago, Armstrong uttered perhaps the 20th century's most famous line: "That's one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind." And by all accounts he really meant it, experts say. [Photos: Neil Armstrong Remembered]

"What he was partaking in was only about furthering the human adventure, furthering what it meant to be human," said space history expert Robert Pearlman, editor of collectSPACE.com and a frequent SPACE.com contributor. "When he said that he went to the moon for all mankind, and that it was a giant leap for all mankind, it really was."

Apollo 11 was Armstrong's last trip to space, and he left NASA in 1971 to become a professor of aerospace engineering at the University of Cincinnati. He kept a low enough profile after his astronaut days that some observers branded him a recluse — an unfair characterization, Pearlman said.

"That wasn't true," Pearlman told SPACE.com, citing Armstrong's teaching stint at Cincinnati and numerous public appearances over the years. "What he didn't do was go Hollywood. He didn't seek the spotlight; he didn't walk down the red carpet."

Armstrong's approach contrasted greatly with that taken by his fellow Apollo 11 moonwalker Buzz Aldrin.

"We were fortunate to have both represented on the same mission," Pearlman said. "We've got the one who was OK with having Buzz Lightyear named after him, and action figures made, and a television movie of his life and all the rest. And with Neil, we have someone who even objected to Hallmark putting his name on an ornament, who didn't want anything to do with the pop culture world."

Concerned for NASA's future

Uncharacteristically, Armstrong waded into the public eye in 2010, voicing his strong objection to the Obama Administration's decision to cancel NASA's moon-oriented Constellation program. He also publicly aired his concerns about the agency's plan to rely on American private spaceships as astronaut taxis in the wake of the space shuttle's retirement.

"We will have no American access to, and return from, low-Earth orbit and the International Space Station for an unpredictable length of time in the future," Armstrong wrote in testimony for a hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Science, Space and Technology in September 2011.

"For a country that has invested so much for so long to achieve a leadership position in space exploration and exploitation, this condition is viewed by many as lamentably embarrassing and unacceptable," he added.

Armstrong's willingness to speak out about NASA's future in the last two years of his life shows how much he cared about the agency and about humanity's future in space, Pearlman said.

Because of his giant leap in 1969, Armstrong is a large part of that future, however it takes shape. The astronaut eventually made some degree of peace with his outsize status, said space policy expert and George Washington University professor emeritus John Logsdon, who crossed paths with Armstrong many times over the past four decades.

"Although he was never comfortable with his status as an icon because of Apollo 11, as he got older he accepted that reality and came to enjoy sharing his experience of landing on the moon with all who would listen," Logsdon told SPACE.com via email.

Follow senior writer Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall or SPACE.com @Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebookand Google+.

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Neil Armstrong remembered as a 'reluctant American hero'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0827/Neil-Armstrong-remembered-as-a-reluctant-American-hero
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe