Are giant squids actually tiny?

Well, no, but humans do tend to exaggerate the size of marine creatures, suggests a new study.

|
Eric Hochberg
Errors in past records may have led to inaccurate measurements.
|
Yomiuri Shimbun
A diver is dwarfed by a giant jellyfish.

When it comes to determining the size of giant squid and other large sea animals, humans have a tendency to exaggerate, a new study suggests.

A team of researchers compared scientific and popular media reports of body sizes for 25 species of marine creatures, including whales, sharks, squids, and other giant ocean dwellers, and found that most of the animals were smaller than what was reported.

"It's human nature to tell a 'fishing story,'" said Craig McClain, a marine biologist at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, North Carolina. In reality, "we're horrible at saying what the size of something is, without actually taking a measurement." [Whale Album: Giants of the Deep]

Size matters

It's been widely reported that giant squid (Architeuthis dux) can reach lengths of about 60 feet (18 meters). But real measurements show that these creatures are actually closer to 40 feet (12 m) long, and even that is extremely rare, McClain told Live Science.

When one of McClain's students noticed the same thing about reports of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus), the researchers decided to conduct a systematic study of reported sizes for large marine animals. They pored through the scientific literature and popular media accounts, examined museum collections and spoke with expert colleagues to track down real size measurements for the animals studied.

The researchers created a database for each colossal creature, with the average and maximum reported measurements, because, as McClain put it, "Asking how big a human is, on average, is a lot different than asking about the tallest human."

For many of these marine megafauna, reported sizes were overestimated, the researchers found. For example, the world's largest gastropod, an Australian trumpet snail (Syrinx aruanus), was reported to be about 35.8 inches (91 centimeters), but the correct measurement for that specimen is actually about 28.3 inches (72 cm).

The maximum size of a whale shark has also been exaggerated. Some reports put the animal's length at 65.6 feet (20 m), but its actual size is more likely 61.7 feet (18.8 m), the researchers said.

The largest reported great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) is generally thought to be about 23 feet (7 m), although some controversial specimens have been larger, the researchers said.

Curiously, sharks that killed humans were reported as much longer than those involved in just a bite, McClain said. One explanation could be that people are more likely to exaggerate the size of a more deadly animal. Or, it could be that larger sharks are more aggressive. "We're not able to flesh that out," McClain said.

Weighing a whale

On the other hand, the reported sizes of a few of the species studied were fairly accurate. For instance, scientists know the largest blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) reach lengths of about 108 feet (33 m) because of data from the whaling industry.

The sizes of other giant ocean creatures — such as the Japanese spider crab (Macrocheira kaempferi) or lion's mane jellyfish (Cyanea capillata) are harder to pin down because the reports are anecdotal, McClain said. Some estimates put the lion's mane at about 120 feet (36.6 m), which would make it larger than a blue whale.

How does one even measure the size of a giant squid or a blue whale? "It's difficult," McClain admits. Some animals, like squid, simply wash ashore. For whale sharks, researchers can put laser-reflective dots at a fixed interval on the creature's side and extrapolate the length. For blue whales, whalers would cook the animals down for fat, and determine the weight from how many pots they had to use, McClain said.

Follow Tanya Lewis on Twitter. Follow us @livescienceFacebook Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Are giant squids actually tiny?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0114/Are-giant-squids-actually-tiny
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe