Taz to the rescue? Study says devil could save Aussie ecosystem

First, dingoes drove Tasmanian devils out of Australia. Now that the dingoes are dwindling, the new top dogs have scientists trying to bring back the devils.

|
Tim Wimborne/Reuters/File
An adult male Tasmanian devil named Tex looks out from behind a log in his enclosure at Sydney's Taronga Zoo, October 17, 2008. A new study suggests that reintroducing Tasmanian devils into Australia's mainland may help control harmful predators like feral cats and foxes.

The key to saving Australia’s ecosystem may be a small but powerful creature that went extinct on the mainland three millennia ago but rose to cartoon fame in the last century: the Tasmanian devil.

The carnivorous marsupials, which were most likely hunted to local extinction by dingoes, have lived out their exile on the island of Tasmania, about 150 miles off the Australian shore. But now that dingoes are dying out as a result of culls to protect livestock, their prey – invasive predators like cats and foxes – are wreaking havoc on the ecosystem.

Enter: the Tasmanian devil. A University of New South Wales study published in “Biological Conservation” assessed the potential impact of reintroducing the creatures into parts of mainland Australia, and found that they could become effective predators and would regulate fox and cat populations in the absence of dingoes.

“The devil is the obvious answer,” PhD candidate David Hunter said in a press release. “It doesn’t pose as serious a risk to livestock, and it has played a major role in stopping foxes from establishing a foothold in Tasmania.”

The benefits, the study said, would be twofold: the devil would help curb predators of smaller animals and preserve low-lying vegetation, and it would also boost devil populations. The last two decades have seen a drop in the number of Tasmanian devils, which scientists attribute to disease.

But a 1995 precedent sets a dubious expectation of success for reintroduction: almost one hundred years after humans eliminated wolves from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, the species was reintroduced to control elk populations, which were damaging willow shrubs and endangering beavers. A Colorado State University study on the park’s ecosystem found that the reintroduction of wolves could not entirely reverse the effects of their removal.

“The decades without wolves changed Yellowstone too much to undo,” Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies’ Arthur Middleton wrote in The New York Times.

If Yellowstone’s ecology changed beyond repair after mere decades, it follows that Australia may see even less luck after millennia of the Tasmanian devil’s absence. Still, the encouraging results of the UNSW study gives the researchers hope that some damage can be undone.

“Devils aren’t a silver bullet, but we think that they could do a lot of good on the mainland, and this study indicates that a monitored process of reintroduction could actually work,” associate professor Mike Letnic said in the press release. “We need to take action to arrest the extinction crisis we have in Australia, and that requires being bold and trying something new.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Taz to the rescue? Study says devil could save Aussie ecosystem
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0813/Taz-to-the-rescue-Study-says-devil-could-save-Aussie-ecosystem
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe