Why Japan gave up on fixing lost satellite Hitomi

The end of the mission is a blow to astronomers who had hoped Hitomi's mission could shed shed light on black holes.

|
Munehide Someya/Kyodo News/AP
Officials of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency bow beside the model of an X-ray astronomy satellite called Hitomi, at headquarters in Tokyo, Japan. Japan's space agency has abandoned its efforts to restore the operations of a multimillion-dollar satellite that was to probe the mysteries of black holes using X-ray telescopes.

Efforts to restore Hitomi, the nearly $290 million X-ray astronomy satellite, are no more.

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) announced the decision Thursday, saying that the spacecraft is too severely damaged to be revived.

The spacecraft, designed to study X-rays emitted by black holes, dark matter, and galaxy clusters in space, was Japan's latest attempt in space exploration after two other failed attempts. Hitomi – which is Japanese for "pupil," as in part of the eye – operated for a few weeks, but only yielded three days' worth of data.

Misfortune struck on March 26 when JAXA lost contact with the spacecraft, more than a month after it was launched from southern Japan on Feb. 17. Initially the agency was optimistic about restoring the spacecraft's operations, after receiving static signals on three occasions. Scientists originally believed the signals were from the lost satellite, but later concluded that the messages appeared to come from slightly different frequencies.

"JAXA will cease the efforts to restore ASTRO-H and will focus on the investigation of anomaly causes," the agency said in a statement. "We will carefully review all phases from design, manufacturing, verification, and operations to identify the causes that may have led to this anomaly including background factors."

The cause of the damage is still unknown, but JAXA concluded that it might have been triggered by incorrect programming that cased the satellite to accelerate its spinning. That spinning likely caused its solar panels to snap off, preventing the spacecraft from generating power.

"There were human errors," Saku Tsuneta, director of JAXA's Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, told reporters during a press conference, according to the International Business Times. "But a bigger problem lies with our entire system as we were not able to detect those errors."

Japan's decision marks yet another blow for astronomers who had hoped the spacecraft would shed light into the mystery of X-rays and black holes that have long intrigued scientists. Scientists cannot detect the X-rays on Earth because the Earth's atmosphere blocks them.

The mission was a joint effort between JAXA, NASA, and eight other nations, including Canada and the Netherlands.

For now the future of Japan's space exploration is uncertain, but Dan McCammon, an astronomer at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, estimates that it may take between three to five years to devise a replacement that will be used to measure X-ray energy.

Dr. McCammon, who helped design Hitomi's premiere scientific instrument, the X-ray calorimeter that measures the energy of X-ray photons, told the journal Nature that NASA would need $50 million to build a replacement. The European Space Agency is set to launch a similar mission in 2028.

Despite the disappointment, scientists are hopeful that some information may still be gleaned from Hitomi's data. As Nature reported:

About eight days after launch, Hitomi turned its X-ray gaze on the Perseus cluster, about 250 million light years from Earth. By measuring the speed of gas flowing from the cluster, Hitomi can reveal how the mass of galaxy clusters changes over time as stars are born and die – a test of the crucial cosmological parameter known as dark energy.

But beyond that, astronomers are mourning the opportunities lost when contact with Hitomi blinked out.

"It's a scientific tragedy," Richard Mushotzky, an astronomer at the University of Maryland in College Park, told Nature. "We had three days. We'd hoped for ten years."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Japan gave up on fixing lost satellite Hitomi
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0429/Why-Japan-gave-up-on-fixing-lost-satellite-Hitomi
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe